The patch titled
Subject: mempolicy trivia: use pgoff_t in shared mempolicy tree
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is
mempolicy-trivia-use-pgoff_t-in-shared-mempolicy-tree.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mempolicy-trivia-use-pgoff_t-in-shared-mempolicy-tree.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mempolicy trivia: use pgoff_t in shared mempolicy tree
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 02:21:34 -0700 (PDT)
Prefer the more explicit "pgoff_t" to "unsigned long" when dealing with a
shared mempolicy tree. Delete confusing comment about pseudo mm vmas.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/5451157-3818-4af5-fd2c-5d26a5d1dc53@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tejun heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/mempolicy.h | 20 +++++++-------------
mm/mempolicy.c | 12 ++++++------
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/mempolicy.h~mempolicy-trivia-use-pgoff_t-in-shared-mempolicy-tree
+++ a/include/linux/mempolicy.h
@@ -107,22 +107,16 @@ static inline bool mpol_equal(struct mem
/*
* Tree of shared policies for a shared memory region.
- * Maintain the policies in a pseudo mm that contains vmas. The vmas
- * carry the policy. As a special twist the pseudo mm is indexed in pages, not
- * bytes, so that we can work with shared memory segments bigger than
- * unsigned long.
*/
-
-struct sp_node {
- struct rb_node nd;
- unsigned long start, end;
- struct mempolicy *policy;
-};
-
struct shared_policy {
struct rb_root root;
rwlock_t lock;
};
+struct sp_node {
+ struct rb_node nd;
+ pgoff_t start, end;
+ struct mempolicy *policy;
+};
int vma_dup_policy(struct vm_area_struct *src, struct vm_area_struct *dst);
void mpol_shared_policy_init(struct shared_policy *sp, struct mempolicy *mpol);
@@ -130,7 +124,7 @@ int mpol_set_shared_policy(struct shared
struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct mempolicy *mpol);
void mpol_free_shared_policy(struct shared_policy *sp);
struct mempolicy *mpol_shared_policy_lookup(struct shared_policy *sp,
- unsigned long idx);
+ pgoff_t idx);
struct mempolicy *get_task_policy(struct task_struct *p);
struct mempolicy *__get_vma_policy(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
@@ -216,7 +210,7 @@ static inline void mpol_free_shared_poli
}
static inline struct mempolicy *
-mpol_shared_policy_lookup(struct shared_policy *sp, unsigned long idx)
+mpol_shared_policy_lookup(struct shared_policy *sp, pgoff_t idx)
{
return NULL;
}
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c~mempolicy-trivia-use-pgoff_t-in-shared-mempolicy-tree
+++ a/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -2448,8 +2448,8 @@ bool __mpol_equal(struct mempolicy *a, s
* lookup first element intersecting start-end. Caller holds sp->lock for
* reading or for writing
*/
-static struct sp_node *
-sp_lookup(struct shared_policy *sp, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
+static struct sp_node *sp_lookup(struct shared_policy *sp,
+ pgoff_t start, pgoff_t end)
{
struct rb_node *n = sp->root.rb_node;
@@ -2503,8 +2503,8 @@ static void sp_insert(struct shared_poli
}
/* Find shared policy intersecting idx */
-struct mempolicy *
-mpol_shared_policy_lookup(struct shared_policy *sp, unsigned long idx)
+struct mempolicy *mpol_shared_policy_lookup(struct shared_policy *sp,
+ pgoff_t idx)
{
struct mempolicy *pol = NULL;
struct sp_node *sn;
@@ -2672,8 +2672,8 @@ static struct sp_node *sp_alloc(unsigned
}
/* Replace a policy range. */
-static int shared_policy_replace(struct shared_policy *sp, unsigned long start,
- unsigned long end, struct sp_node *new)
+static int shared_policy_replace(struct shared_policy *sp, pgoff_t start,
+ pgoff_t end, struct sp_node *new)
{
struct sp_node *n;
struct sp_node *n_new = NULL;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from hughd@xxxxxxxxxx are
shmem-shrink-shmem_inode_info-dir_offsets-in-a-union.patch
shmem-remove-vma-arg-from-shmem_get_folio_gfp.patch
shmem-factor-shmem_falloc_wait-out-of-shmem_fault.patch
shmem-trivial-tidyups-removing-extra-blank-lines-etc.patch
shmem-shmem_acct_blocks-and-shmem_inode_acct_blocks.patch
shmem-move-memcg-charge-out-of-shmem_add_to_page_cache.patch
shmem-_add_to_page_cache-before-shmem_inode_acct_blocks.patch
shmempercpu_counter-add-_limited_addfbc-limit-amount.patch
hugetlbfs-drop-shared-numa-mempolicy-pretence.patch
kernfs-drop-shared-numa-mempolicy-hooks.patch
mempolicy-fix-migrate_pages2-syscall-return-nr_failed.patch
mempolicy-trivia-delete-those-ancient-pr_debugs.patch
mempolicy-trivia-slightly-more-consistent-naming.patch
mempolicy-trivia-use-pgoff_t-in-shared-mempolicy-tree.patch
mempolicy-mpol_shared_policy_init-without-pseudo-vma.patch
mempolicy-remove-confusing-mpol_mf_lazy-dead-code.patch
mm-add-page_rmappable_folio-wrapper.patch
mempolicy-alloc_pages_mpol-for-numa-policy-without-vma.patch
mempolicy-mmap_lock-is-not-needed-while-migrating-folios.patch
mempolicy-migration-attempt-to-match-interleave-nodes.patch
