+ minmax-allow-min-max-clamp-if-the-arguments-have-the-same-signedness.patch added to mm-nonmm-unstable branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: minmax: allow min()/max()/clamp() if the arguments have the same signedness.
has been added to the -mm mm-nonmm-unstable branch.  Its filename is
     minmax-allow-min-max-clamp-if-the-arguments-have-the-same-signedness.patch

This patch will shortly appear at
     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/minmax-allow-min-max-clamp-if-the-arguments-have-the-same-signedness.patch

This patch will later appear in the mm-nonmm-unstable branch at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: minmax: allow min()/max()/clamp() if the arguments have the same signedness.
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 08:17:15 +0000

The type-check in min()/max() is there to stop unexpected results if a
negative value gets converted to a large unsigned value.  However it also
rejects 'unsigned int' v 'unsigned long' compares which are common and
never problematc.

Replace the 'same type' check with a 'same signedness' check.

The new test isn't itself a compile time error, so use static_assert() to
report the error and give a meaningful error message.

Due to the way builtin_choose_expr() works detecting the error in the
'non-constant' side (where static_assert() can be used) also detects
errors when the arguments are constant.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/fe7e6c542e094bfca655abcd323c1c98@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: David Laight <david.laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 include/linux/minmax.h |   62 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/minmax.h~minmax-allow-min-max-clamp-if-the-arguments-have-the-same-signedness
+++ a/include/linux/minmax.h
@@ -12,9 +12,8 @@
  *
  * - avoid multiple evaluations of the arguments (so side-effects like
  *   "x++" happen only once) when non-constant.
- * - perform strict type-checking (to generate warnings instead of
- *   nasty runtime surprises). See the "unnecessary" pointer comparison
- *   in __typecheck().
+ * - perform signed v unsigned type-checking (to generate compile
+ *   errors instead of nasty runtime surprises).
  * - retain result as a constant expressions when called with only
  *   constant expressions (to avoid tripping VLA warnings in stack
  *   allocation usage).
@@ -22,23 +21,30 @@
 #define __typecheck(x, y) \
 	(!!(sizeof((typeof(x) *)1 == (typeof(y) *)1)))
 
-#define __no_side_effects(x, y) \
-		(__is_constexpr(x) && __is_constexpr(y))
+/* is_signed_type() isn't a constexpr for pointer types */
+#define __is_signed(x) 								\
+	__builtin_choose_expr(__is_constexpr(is_signed_type(typeof(x))),	\
+		is_signed_type(typeof(x)), 0)
 
-#define __safe_cmp(x, y) \
-		(__typecheck(x, y) && __no_side_effects(x, y))
+#define __types_ok(x, y) \
+	(__is_signed(x) == __is_signed(y))
 
-#define __cmp(x, y, op)	((x) op (y) ? (x) : (y))
+#define __cmp_op_min <
+#define __cmp_op_max >
 
-#define __cmp_once(x, y, unique_x, unique_y, op) ({	\
+#define __cmp(op, x, y)	((x) __cmp_op_##op (y) ? (x) : (y))
+
+#define __cmp_once(op, x, y, unique_x, unique_y) ({	\
 		typeof(x) unique_x = (x);		\
 		typeof(y) unique_y = (y);		\
-		__cmp(unique_x, unique_y, op); })
-
-#define __careful_cmp(x, y, op) \
-	__builtin_choose_expr(__safe_cmp(x, y), \
-		__cmp(x, y, op), \
-		__cmp_once(x, y, __UNIQUE_ID(__x), __UNIQUE_ID(__y), op))
+		static_assert(__types_ok(x, y),		\
+			#op "(" #x ", " #y ") signedness error, fix types or consider u" #op "() before " #op "_t()"); \
+		__cmp(op, unique_x, unique_y); })
+
+#define __careful_cmp(op, x, y)					\
+	__builtin_choose_expr(__is_constexpr((x) - (y)),	\
+		__cmp(op, x, y),				\
+		__cmp_once(op, x, y, __UNIQUE_ID(__x), __UNIQUE_ID(__y)))
 
 #define __clamp(val, lo, hi)	\
 	((val) >= (hi) ? (hi) : ((val) <= (lo) ? (lo) : (val)))
@@ -47,17 +53,15 @@
 		typeof(val) unique_val = (val);				\
 		typeof(lo) unique_lo = (lo);				\
 		typeof(hi) unique_hi = (hi);				\
+		static_assert(__builtin_choose_expr(__is_constexpr((lo) > (hi)), 	\
+				(lo) <= (hi), true),					\
+			"clamp() low limit " #lo " greater than high limit " #hi);	\
+		static_assert(__types_ok(val, lo), "clamp() 'lo' signedness error");	\
+		static_assert(__types_ok(val, hi), "clamp() 'hi' signedness error");	\
 		__clamp(unique_val, unique_lo, unique_hi); })
 
-#define __clamp_input_check(lo, hi)					\
-        (BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(__builtin_choose_expr(			\
-                __is_constexpr((lo) > (hi)), (lo) > (hi), false)))
-
 #define __careful_clamp(val, lo, hi) ({					\
-	__clamp_input_check(lo, hi) +					\
-	__builtin_choose_expr(__typecheck(val, lo) && __typecheck(val, hi) && \
-			      __typecheck(hi, lo) && __is_constexpr(val) && \
-			      __is_constexpr(lo) && __is_constexpr(hi),	\
+	__builtin_choose_expr(__is_constexpr((val) - (lo) + (hi)),	\
 		__clamp(val, lo, hi),					\
 		__clamp_once(val, lo, hi, __UNIQUE_ID(__val),		\
 			     __UNIQUE_ID(__lo), __UNIQUE_ID(__hi))); })
@@ -67,14 +71,14 @@
  * @x: first value
  * @y: second value
  */
-#define min(x, y)	__careful_cmp(x, y, <)
+#define min(x, y)	__careful_cmp(min, x, y)
 
 /**
  * max - return maximum of two values of the same or compatible types
  * @x: first value
  * @y: second value
  */
-#define max(x, y)	__careful_cmp(x, y, >)
+#define max(x, y)	__careful_cmp(max, x, y)
 
 /**
  * umin - return minimum of two non-negative values
@@ -83,7 +87,7 @@
  * @y: second value
  */
 #define umin(x, y)	\
-	__careful_cmp((x) + 0u + 0ul + 0ull, (y) + 0u + 0ul + 0ull, <)
+	__careful_cmp(min, (x) + 0u + 0ul + 0ull, (y) + 0u + 0ul + 0ull)
 
 /**
  * umax - return maximum of two non-negative values
@@ -91,7 +95,7 @@
  * @y: second value
  */
 #define umax(x, y)	\
-	__careful_cmp((x) + 0u + 0ul + 0ull, (y) + 0u + 0ul + 0ull, >)
+	__careful_cmp(max, (x) + 0u + 0ul + 0ull, (y) + 0u + 0ul + 0ull)
 
 /**
  * min3 - return minimum of three values
@@ -143,7 +147,7 @@
  * @x: first value
  * @y: second value
  */
-#define min_t(type, x, y)	__careful_cmp((type)(x), (type)(y), <)
+#define min_t(type, x, y)	__careful_cmp(min, (type)(x), (type)(y))
 
 /**
  * max_t - return maximum of two values, using the specified type
@@ -151,7 +155,7 @@
  * @x: first value
  * @y: second value
  */
-#define max_t(type, x, y)	__careful_cmp((type)(x), (type)(y), >)
+#define max_t(type, x, y)	__careful_cmp(max, (type)(x), (type)(y))
 
 /*
  * Do not check the array parameter using __must_be_array().
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx are

minmax-add-umina-b-and-umaxa-b.patch
minmax-allow-min-max-clamp-if-the-arguments-have-the-same-signedness.patch
minmax-fix-indentation-of-__cmp_once-and-__clamp_once.patch
minmax-allow-comparisons-of-int-against-unsigned-char-short.patch
minmax-relax-check-to-allow-comparison-between-unsigned-arguments-and-signed-constants.patch




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux