The patch titled
Subject: zswap: make shrinking memcg-aware
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is
zswap-make-shrinking-memcg-aware.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/zswap-make-shrinking-memcg-aware.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: zswap: make shrinking memcg-aware
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 10:14:46 -0700
Patch series "workload-specific and memory pressure-driven zswap
writeback", v2.
There are currently several issues with zswap writeback:
1. There is only a single global LRU for zswap. This makes it impossible
to perform worload-specific shrinking - an memcg under memory
pressure cannot determine which pages in the pool it owns, and often
ends up writing pages from other memcgs. This issue has been
previously observed in practice and mitigated by simply disabling
memcg-initiated shrinking:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230530232435.3097106-1-nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx/T/#u
But this solution leaves a lot to be desired, as we still do not have an
avenue for an memcg to free up its own memory locked up in zswap.
2. We only shrink the zswap pool when the user-defined limit is hit.
This means that if we set the limit too high, cold data that are
unlikely to be used again will reside in the pool, wasting precious
memory. It is hard to predict how much zswap space will be needed
ahead of time, as this depends on the workload (specifically, on
factors such as memory access patterns and compressibility of the
memory pages).
This patch series solves these issues by separating the global zswap
LRU into per-memcg and per-NUMA LRUs, and performs workload-specific
(i.e memcg- and NUMA-aware) zswap writeback under memory pressure. The
new shrinker does not have any parameter that must be tuned by the
user, and can be opted in or out on a per-memcg basis.
On a benchmark that we have run:
(without the shrinker)
real -- mean: 153.27s, median: 153.199s
sys -- mean: 541.652s, median: 541.903s
user -- mean: 4384.9673999999995s, median: 4385.471s
(with the shrinker)
real -- mean: 151.4956s, median: 151.456s
sys -- mean: 461.14639999999997s, median: 465.656s
user -- mean: 4384.7118s, median: 4384.675s
We observed a 14-15% reduction in kernel CPU time, which translated to
over 1% reduction in real time.
On another benchmark, where there was a lot more cold memory residing in
zswap, we observed even more pronounced gains:
(without the shrinker)
real -- mean: 157.52519999999998s, median: 157.281s
sys -- mean: 769.3082s, median: 780.545s
user -- mean: 4378.1622s, median: 4378.286s
(with the shrinker)
real -- mean: 152.9608s, median: 152.845s
sys -- mean: 517.4446s, median: 506.749s
user -- mean: 4387.694s, median: 4387.935s
Here, we saw around 32-35% reduction in kernel CPU time, which
translated to 2.8% reduction in real time. These results confirm our
hypothesis that the shrinker is more helpful the more cold memory we
have.
This patch (of 2):
Currently, we only have a single global LRU for zswap. This makes it
impossible to perform worload-specific shrinking - an memcg cannot
determine which pages in the pool it owns, and often ends up writing pages
from other memcgs. This issue has been previously observed in practice
and mitigated by simply disabling memcg-initiated shrinking:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230530232435.3097106-1-nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx/T/#u
This patch fully resolves the issue by replacing the global zswap LRU
with memcg- and NUMA-specific LRUs, and modify the reclaim logic:
a) When a store attempt hits an memcg limit, it now triggers a
synchronous reclaim attempt that, if successful, allows the new
hotter page to be accepted by zswap.
b) If the store attempt instead hits the global zswap limit, it will
trigger an asynchronous reclaim attempt, in which an memcg is
selected for reclaim in a round-robin-like fashion.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230919171447.2712746-1-nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230919171447.2712746-2-nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@xxxxxxxxx>
Co-developed-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/list_lru.h | 39 ++++++
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 5
include/linux/zswap.h | 9 +
mm/list_lru.c | 46 ++++++-
mm/swap_state.c | 19 +++
mm/zswap.c | 221 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
6 files changed, 287 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/list_lru.h~zswap-make-shrinking-memcg-aware
+++ a/include/linux/list_lru.h
@@ -90,6 +90,24 @@ void memcg_reparent_list_lrus(struct mem
bool list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item);
/**
+ * __list_lru_add: add an element to a specific sublist.
+ * @list_lru: the lru pointer
+ * @item: the item to be added.
+ * @memcg: the cgroup of the sublist to add the item to.
+ * @nid: the node id of the sublist to add the item to.
+ *
+ * This function is similar to list_lru_add(), but it allows the caller to
+ * specify the sublist to which the item should be added. This can be useful
+ * when the list_head node is not necessarily in the same cgroup and NUMA node
+ * as the data it represents, such as zswap, where the list_head node could be
+ * from kswapd and the data from a different cgroup altogether.
+ *
+ * Return value: true if the list was updated, false otherwise
+ */
+bool __list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item, int nid,
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
+
+/**
* list_lru_del: delete an element to the lru list
* @list_lru: the lru pointer
* @item: the item to be deleted.
@@ -103,6 +121,18 @@ bool list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru,
bool list_lru_del(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item);
/**
+ * __list_lru_delete: delete an element from a specific sublist.
+ * @list_lru: the lru pointer
+ * @item: the item to be deleted.
+ * @memcg: the cgroup of the sublist to delete the item from.
+ * @nid: the node id of the sublist to delete the item from.
+ *
+ * Return value: true if the list was updated, false otherwise.
+ */
+bool __list_lru_del(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item, int nid,
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
+
+/**
* list_lru_count_one: return the number of objects currently held by @lru
* @lru: the lru pointer.
* @nid: the node id to count from.
@@ -137,6 +167,15 @@ void list_lru_isolate(struct list_lru_on
void list_lru_isolate_move(struct list_lru_one *list, struct list_head *item,
struct list_head *head);
+/*
+ * list_lru_putback: undo list_lru_isolate.
+ *
+ * Since we might have dropped the LRU lock in between, recompute list_lru_one
+ * from the node's id and memcg.
+ */
+void list_lru_putback(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item, int nid,
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
+
typedef enum lru_status (*list_lru_walk_cb)(struct list_head *item,
struct list_lru_one *list, spinlock_t *lock, void *cb_arg);
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h~zswap-make-shrinking-memcg-aware
+++ a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -1179,6 +1179,11 @@ static inline struct mem_cgroup *page_me
return NULL;
}
+static inline struct mem_cgroup *get_mem_cgroup_from_objcg(struct obj_cgroup *objcg)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+
static inline bool folio_memcg_kmem(struct folio *folio)
{
return false;
--- a/include/linux/zswap.h~zswap-make-shrinking-memcg-aware
+++ a/include/linux/zswap.h
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ bool zswap_load(struct folio *folio);
void zswap_invalidate(int type, pgoff_t offset);
void zswap_swapon(int type);
void zswap_swapoff(int type);
+bool zswap_remove_swpentry_from_lru(swp_entry_t swpentry);
+void zswap_insert_swpentry_into_lru(swp_entry_t swpentry);
#else
@@ -32,6 +34,13 @@ static inline void zswap_invalidate(int
static inline void zswap_swapon(int type) {}
static inline void zswap_swapoff(int type) {}
+static inline bool zswap_remove_swpentry_from_lru(swp_entry_t swpentry)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
+static inline void zswap_insert_swpentry_into_lru(swp_entry_t swpentry) {}
+
#endif
#endif /* _LINUX_ZSWAP_H */
--- a/mm/list_lru.c~zswap-make-shrinking-memcg-aware
+++ a/mm/list_lru.c
@@ -119,18 +119,26 @@ list_lru_from_kmem(struct list_lru *lru,
bool list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item)
{
int nid = page_to_nid(virt_to_page(item));
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg = list_lru_memcg_aware(lru) ?
+ mem_cgroup_from_slab_obj(item) : NULL;
+
+ return __list_lru_add(lru, item, nid, memcg);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_add);
+
+bool __list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item, int nid,
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+{
struct list_lru_node *nlru = &lru->node[nid];
- struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
struct list_lru_one *l;
spin_lock(&nlru->lock);
if (list_empty(item)) {
- l = list_lru_from_kmem(lru, nid, item, &memcg);
+ l = list_lru_from_memcg_idx(lru, nid, memcg_kmem_id(memcg));
list_add_tail(item, &l->list);
/* Set shrinker bit if the first element was added */
if (!l->nr_items++)
- set_shrinker_bit(memcg, nid,
- lru_shrinker_id(lru));
+ set_shrinker_bit(memcg, nid, lru_shrinker_id(lru));
nlru->nr_items++;
spin_unlock(&nlru->lock);
return true;
@@ -138,17 +146,27 @@ bool list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru,
spin_unlock(&nlru->lock);
return false;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_add);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__list_lru_add);
bool list_lru_del(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item)
{
int nid = page_to_nid(virt_to_page(item));
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg = list_lru_memcg_aware(lru) ?
+ mem_cgroup_from_slab_obj(item) : NULL;
+
+ return __list_lru_del(lru, item, nid, memcg);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_del);
+
+bool __list_lru_del(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item, int nid,
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+{
struct list_lru_node *nlru = &lru->node[nid];
struct list_lru_one *l;
spin_lock(&nlru->lock);
if (!list_empty(item)) {
- l = list_lru_from_kmem(lru, nid, item, NULL);
+ l = list_lru_from_memcg_idx(lru, nid, memcg_kmem_id(memcg));
list_del_init(item);
l->nr_items--;
nlru->nr_items--;
@@ -158,7 +176,7 @@ bool list_lru_del(struct list_lru *lru,
spin_unlock(&nlru->lock);
return false;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_del);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__list_lru_del);
void list_lru_isolate(struct list_lru_one *list, struct list_head *item)
{
@@ -175,6 +193,20 @@ void list_lru_isolate_move(struct list_l
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_isolate_move);
+void list_lru_putback(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item, int nid,
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+{
+ struct list_lru_one *list =
+ list_lru_from_memcg_idx(lru, nid, memcg_kmem_id(memcg));
+
+ if (list_empty(item)) {
+ list_add_tail(item, &list->list);
+ if (!list->nr_items++)
+ set_shrinker_bit(memcg, nid, lru_shrinker_id(lru));
+ }
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_putback);
+
unsigned long list_lru_count_one(struct list_lru *lru,
int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
--- a/mm/swap_state.c~zswap-make-shrinking-memcg-aware
+++ a/mm/swap_state.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include <linux/swap_slots.h>
#include <linux/huge_mm.h>
#include <linux/shmem_fs.h>
+#include <linux/zswap.h>
#include "internal.h"
#include "swap.h"
@@ -417,6 +418,7 @@ struct page *__read_swap_cache_async(swp
struct folio *folio;
struct page *page;
void *shadow = NULL;
+ bool zswap_lru_removed = false;
*new_page_allocated = false;
si = get_swap_device(entry);
@@ -485,6 +487,17 @@ struct page *__read_swap_cache_async(swp
__folio_set_locked(folio);
__folio_set_swapbacked(folio);
+ /*
+ * Page fault might itself trigger reclaim, on a zswap object that
+ * corresponds to the same swap entry. However, as the swap entry has
+ * previously been pinned, the task will run into an infinite loop trying
+ * to pin the swap entry again.
+ *
+ * To prevent this from happening, we remove it from the zswap
+ * LRU to prevent its reclamation.
+ */
+ zswap_lru_removed = zswap_remove_swpentry_from_lru(entry);
+
if (mem_cgroup_swapin_charge_folio(folio, NULL, gfp_mask, entry))
goto fail_unlock;
@@ -497,6 +510,9 @@ struct page *__read_swap_cache_async(swp
if (shadow)
workingset_refault(folio, shadow);
+ if (zswap_lru_removed)
+ zswap_insert_swpentry_into_lru(entry);
+
/* Caller will initiate read into locked folio */
folio_add_lru(folio);
*new_page_allocated = true;
@@ -506,6 +522,9 @@ got_page:
return page;
fail_unlock:
+ if (zswap_lru_removed)
+ zswap_insert_swpentry_into_lru(entry);
+
put_swap_folio(folio, entry);
folio_unlock(folio);
folio_put(folio);
--- a/mm/zswap.c~zswap-make-shrinking-memcg-aware
+++ a/mm/zswap.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
#include <linux/writeback.h>
#include <linux/pagemap.h>
#include <linux/workqueue.h>
+#include <linux/list_lru.h>
#include "swap.h"
#include "internal.h"
@@ -171,8 +172,8 @@ struct zswap_pool {
struct work_struct shrink_work;
struct hlist_node node;
char tfm_name[CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME];
- struct list_head lru;
- spinlock_t lru_lock;
+ struct list_lru list_lru;
+ struct mem_cgroup *next_shrink;
};
/*
@@ -209,6 +210,7 @@ struct zswap_entry {
unsigned long value;
};
struct obj_cgroup *objcg;
+ int nid;
struct list_head lru;
};
@@ -310,6 +312,29 @@ static void zswap_entry_cache_free(struc
}
/*********************************
+* lru functions
+**********************************/
+static bool zswap_lru_add(struct list_lru *list_lru, struct zswap_entry *entry)
+{
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg = entry->objcg ?
+ get_mem_cgroup_from_objcg(entry->objcg) : NULL;
+ bool added = __list_lru_add(list_lru, &entry->lru, entry->nid, memcg);
+
+ mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
+ return added;
+}
+
+static bool zswap_lru_del(struct list_lru *list_lru, struct zswap_entry *entry)
+{
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg = entry->objcg ?
+ get_mem_cgroup_from_objcg(entry->objcg) : NULL;
+ bool removed = __list_lru_del(list_lru, &entry->lru, entry->nid, memcg);
+
+ mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
+ return removed;
+}
+
+/*********************************
* rbtree functions
**********************************/
static struct zswap_entry *zswap_rb_search(struct rb_root *root, pgoff_t offset)
@@ -393,9 +418,7 @@ static void zswap_free_entry(struct zswa
if (!entry->length)
atomic_dec(&zswap_same_filled_pages);
else {
- spin_lock(&entry->pool->lru_lock);
- list_del(&entry->lru);
- spin_unlock(&entry->pool->lru_lock);
+ zswap_lru_del(&entry->pool->list_lru, entry);
zpool_free(zswap_find_zpool(entry), entry->handle);
zswap_pool_put(entry->pool);
}
@@ -629,21 +652,16 @@ static void zswap_invalidate_entry(struc
zswap_entry_put(tree, entry);
}
-static int zswap_reclaim_entry(struct zswap_pool *pool)
+static enum lru_status shrink_memcg_cb(struct list_head *item, struct list_lru_one *l,
+ spinlock_t *lock, void *arg)
{
- struct zswap_entry *entry;
+ struct zswap_entry *entry = container_of(item, struct zswap_entry, lru);
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
struct zswap_tree *tree;
pgoff_t swpoffset;
- int ret;
+ enum lru_status ret = LRU_REMOVED_RETRY;
+ int writeback_result;
- /* Get an entry off the LRU */
- spin_lock(&pool->lru_lock);
- if (list_empty(&pool->lru)) {
- spin_unlock(&pool->lru_lock);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- entry = list_last_entry(&pool->lru, struct zswap_entry, lru);
- list_del_init(&entry->lru);
/*
* Once the lru lock is dropped, the entry might get freed. The
* swpoffset is copied to the stack, and entry isn't deref'd again
@@ -651,26 +669,35 @@ static int zswap_reclaim_entry(struct zs
*/
swpoffset = swp_offset(entry->swpentry);
tree = zswap_trees[swp_type(entry->swpentry)];
- spin_unlock(&pool->lru_lock);
+ list_lru_isolate(l, item);
+ spin_unlock(lock);
/* Check for invalidate() race */
spin_lock(&tree->lock);
if (entry != zswap_rb_search(&tree->rbroot, swpoffset)) {
- ret = -EAGAIN;
goto unlock;
}
/* Hold a reference to prevent a free during writeback */
zswap_entry_get(entry);
spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
- ret = zswap_writeback_entry(entry, tree);
+ writeback_result = zswap_writeback_entry(entry, tree);
spin_lock(&tree->lock);
- if (ret) {
- /* Writeback failed, put entry back on LRU */
- spin_lock(&pool->lru_lock);
- list_move(&entry->lru, &pool->lru);
- spin_unlock(&pool->lru_lock);
+ if (writeback_result) {
+ zswap_reject_reclaim_fail++;
+
+ /* Check for invalidate() race */
+ if (entry != zswap_rb_search(&tree->rbroot, swpoffset))
+ goto put_unlock;
+
+ memcg = entry->objcg ? get_mem_cgroup_from_objcg(entry->objcg) : NULL;
+ spin_lock(lock);
+ /* we cannot use zswap_lru_add here, because it increments node's lru count */
+ list_lru_putback(&entry->pool->list_lru, item, entry->nid, memcg);
+ spin_unlock(lock);
+ mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
+ ret = LRU_RETRY;
goto put_unlock;
}
@@ -686,19 +713,63 @@ put_unlock:
zswap_entry_put(tree, entry);
unlock:
spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
- return ret ? -EAGAIN : 0;
+ spin_lock(lock);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int shrink_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+{
+ struct zswap_pool *pool;
+ int nid, shrunk = 0;
+ bool is_empty = true;
+
+ pool = zswap_pool_current_get();
+ if (!pool)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ for_each_node_state(nid, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
+ unsigned long nr_to_walk = 1;
+
+ if (list_lru_walk_one(&pool->list_lru, nid, memcg, &shrink_memcg_cb,
+ NULL, &nr_to_walk))
+ shrunk++;
+ if (!nr_to_walk)
+ is_empty = false;
+ }
+ zswap_pool_put(pool);
+
+ if (is_empty)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (shrunk)
+ return 0;
+ return -EAGAIN;
}
static void shrink_worker(struct work_struct *w)
{
struct zswap_pool *pool = container_of(w, typeof(*pool),
shrink_work);
- int ret, failures = 0;
+ int ret, failures = 0, memcg_selection_failures = 0;
+ /* global reclaim will select cgroup in a round-robin fashion. */
do {
- ret = zswap_reclaim_entry(pool);
+ /* previous next_shrink has become a zombie - restart from the top */
+ if (pool->next_shrink && !mem_cgroup_online(pool->next_shrink)) {
+ mem_cgroup_put(pool->next_shrink);
+ pool->next_shrink = NULL;
+ }
+ pool->next_shrink = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, pool->next_shrink, NULL);
+
+ /* fails to find a suitable cgroup - give the worker another chance. */
+ if (!pool->next_shrink) {
+ if (++memcg_selection_failures == 2)
+ break;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ ret = shrink_memcg(pool->next_shrink);
+
if (ret) {
- zswap_reject_reclaim_fail++;
if (ret != -EAGAIN)
break;
if (++failures == MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES)
@@ -764,9 +835,8 @@ static struct zswap_pool *zswap_pool_cre
*/
kref_init(&pool->kref);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->list);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->lru);
- spin_lock_init(&pool->lru_lock);
INIT_WORK(&pool->shrink_work, shrink_worker);
+ list_lru_init_memcg(&pool->list_lru, NULL);
zswap_pool_debug("created", pool);
@@ -831,6 +901,9 @@ static void zswap_pool_destroy(struct zs
cpuhp_state_remove_instance(CPUHP_MM_ZSWP_POOL_PREPARE, &pool->node);
free_percpu(pool->acomp_ctx);
+ list_lru_destroy(&pool->list_lru);
+ if (pool->next_shrink)
+ mem_cgroup_put(pool->next_shrink);
for (i = 0; i < ZSWAP_NR_ZPOOLS; i++)
zpool_destroy_pool(pool->zpools[i]);
kfree(pool);
@@ -1199,8 +1272,10 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
struct scatterlist input, output;
struct crypto_acomp_ctx *acomp_ctx;
struct obj_cgroup *objcg = NULL;
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;
struct zswap_pool *pool;
struct zpool *zpool;
+ int lru_alloc_ret;
unsigned int dlen = PAGE_SIZE;
unsigned long handle, value;
char *buf;
@@ -1218,14 +1293,15 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
if (!zswap_enabled || !tree)
return false;
- /*
- * XXX: zswap reclaim does not work with cgroups yet. Without a
- * cgroup-aware entry LRU, we will push out entries system-wide based on
- * local cgroup limits.
- */
objcg = get_obj_cgroup_from_folio(folio);
- if (objcg && !obj_cgroup_may_zswap(objcg))
- goto reject;
+ if (objcg && !obj_cgroup_may_zswap(objcg)) {
+ memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_objcg(objcg);
+ if (shrink_memcg(memcg)) {
+ mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
+ goto reject;
+ }
+ mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
+ }
/* reclaim space if needed */
if (zswap_is_full()) {
@@ -1240,7 +1316,11 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
else
zswap_pool_reached_full = false;
}
-
+ pool = zswap_pool_current_get();
+ if (!pool) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto reject;
+ }
/* allocate entry */
entry = zswap_entry_cache_alloc(GFP_KERNEL);
if (!entry) {
@@ -1256,6 +1336,7 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
entry->length = 0;
entry->value = value;
atomic_inc(&zswap_same_filled_pages);
+ zswap_pool_put(pool);
goto insert_entry;
}
kunmap_atomic(src);
@@ -1264,6 +1345,15 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
if (!zswap_non_same_filled_pages_enabled)
goto freepage;
+ if (objcg) {
+ memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_objcg(objcg);
+ lru_alloc_ret = memcg_list_lru_alloc(memcg, &pool->list_lru, GFP_KERNEL);
+ mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
+
+ if (lru_alloc_ret)
+ goto freepage;
+ }
+
/* if entry is successfully added, it keeps the reference */
entry->pool = zswap_pool_current_get();
if (!entry->pool)
@@ -1325,6 +1415,7 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
insert_entry:
entry->objcg = objcg;
+ entry->nid = page_to_nid(page);
if (objcg) {
obj_cgroup_charge_zswap(objcg, entry->length);
/* Account before objcg ref is moved to tree */
@@ -1338,9 +1429,8 @@ insert_entry:
zswap_invalidate_entry(tree, dupentry);
}
if (entry->length) {
- spin_lock(&entry->pool->lru_lock);
- list_add(&entry->lru, &entry->pool->lru);
- spin_unlock(&entry->pool->lru_lock);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->lru);
+ zswap_lru_add(&pool->list_lru, entry);
}
spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
@@ -1447,9 +1537,8 @@ freeentry:
zswap_invalidate_entry(tree, entry);
folio_mark_dirty(folio);
} else if (entry->length) {
- spin_lock(&entry->pool->lru_lock);
- list_move(&entry->lru, &entry->pool->lru);
- spin_unlock(&entry->pool->lru_lock);
+ zswap_lru_del(&entry->pool->list_lru, entry);
+ zswap_lru_add(&entry->pool->list_lru, entry);
}
zswap_entry_put(tree, entry);
spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
@@ -1507,6 +1596,48 @@ void zswap_swapoff(int type)
zswap_trees[type] = NULL;
}
+bool zswap_remove_swpentry_from_lru(swp_entry_t swpentry)
+{
+ struct zswap_tree *tree = zswap_trees[swp_type(swpentry)];
+ struct zswap_entry *entry;
+ struct zswap_pool *pool;
+ bool removed = false;
+
+ /* get the zswap entry and prevent it from being freed */
+ spin_lock(&tree->lock);
+ entry = zswap_rb_search(&tree->rbroot, swp_offset(swpentry));
+ /* skip if the entry is already written back or is a same filled page */
+ if (!entry || !entry->length)
+ goto tree_unlock;
+
+ pool = entry->pool;
+ removed = zswap_lru_del(&pool->list_lru, entry);
+
+tree_unlock:
+ spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
+ return removed;
+}
+
+void zswap_insert_swpentry_into_lru(swp_entry_t swpentry)
+{
+ struct zswap_tree *tree = zswap_trees[swp_type(swpentry)];
+ struct zswap_entry *entry;
+ struct zswap_pool *pool;
+
+ /* get the zswap entry and prevent it from being freed */
+ spin_lock(&tree->lock);
+ entry = zswap_rb_search(&tree->rbroot, swp_offset(swpentry));
+ /* skip if the entry is already written back or is a same filled page */
+ if (!entry || !entry->length)
+ goto tree_unlock;
+
+ pool = entry->pool;
+ zswap_lru_add(&pool->list_lru, entry);
+
+tree_unlock:
+ spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
+}
+
/*********************************
* debugfs functions
**********************************/
@@ -1560,7 +1691,7 @@ static int zswap_setup(void)
struct zswap_pool *pool;
int ret;
- zswap_entry_cache = KMEM_CACHE(zswap_entry, 0);
+ zswap_entry_cache = KMEM_CACHE(zswap_entry, SLAB_ACCOUNT);
if (!zswap_entry_cache) {
pr_err("entry cache creation failed\n");
goto cache_fail;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from cerasuolodomenico@xxxxxxxxx are
zswap-make-shrinking-memcg-aware.patch
