Re: + minmax-deduplicate-__unconst_integer_typeof.patch added to mm-nonmm-unstable branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 11:25:56AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> The patch titled
>      Subject: minmax: deduplicate __unconst_integer_typeof()
> has been added to the -mm mm-nonmm-unstable branch.  Its filename is
>      minmax-deduplicate-__unconst_integer_typeof.patch
> 
> This patch will shortly appear at
>      https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/minmax-deduplicate-__unconst_integer_typeof.patch
> 
> This patch will later appear in the mm-nonmm-unstable branch at
>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
> 
> Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
>    a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
>    b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
>    c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
>       reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
> 
> *** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
> 
> The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
> branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
> and is updated there every 2-3 working days

...

>  /*

> -/*
>   * Do not check the array parameter using __must_be_array().
>   * In the following legit use-case where the "array" passed is a simple pointer,
>   * __must_be_array() will return a failure.

A side note: If you look at the original email and patch you will see a subtle
difference that makes patch better looking. It's because I started using
--patience when formatting them. Perhaps you can enable it in your scripts.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux