The patch titled
Subject: mm/compaction: improve comment of is_via_compact_memory
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is
mm-compaction-improve-comment-of-is_via_compact_memory.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-compaction-improve-comment-of-is_via_compact_memory.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/compaction: improve comment of is_via_compact_memory
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 23:51:40 +0800
We do proactive compaction with order == -1 via
1. /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
2. /sys/devices/system/node/nodex/compact
3. /proc/sys/vm/compaction_proactiveness
Add missed situation in which order == -1.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230901155141.249860-6-shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/compaction.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/compaction.c~mm-compaction-improve-comment-of-is_via_compact_memory
+++ a/mm/compaction.c
@@ -2065,8 +2065,10 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migrate
}
/*
- * order == -1 is expected when compacting via
- * /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
+ * order == -1 is expected when compacting proactively via
+ * 1. /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
+ * 2. /sys/devices/system/node/nodex/compact
+ * 3. /proc/sys/vm/compaction_proactiveness
*/
static inline bool is_via_compact_memory(int order)
{
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
mm-compaction-use-correct-list-in-move_freelist_head-tail.patch
mm-compaction-call-list_is_first-last-more-intuitively-in-move_freelist_head-tail.patch
mm-compaction-correctly-return-failure-with-bogus-compound_order-in-strict-mode.patch
mm-compaction-remove-repeat-compact_blockskip_flush-check-in-reset_isolation_suitable.patch
mm-compaction-improve-comment-of-is_via_compact_memory.patch
mm-compaction-factor-out-code-to-test-if-we-should-run-compaction-for-target-order.patch
