+ kill-do_each_thread.patch added to mm-nonmm-unstable branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: kill do_each_thread()
has been added to the -mm mm-nonmm-unstable branch.  Its filename is
     kill-do_each_thread.patch

This patch will shortly appear at
     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/kill-do_each_thread.patch

This patch will later appear in the mm-nonmm-unstable branch at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: kill do_each_thread()
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 18:37:08 +0200

Eric has pointed out that we still have 3 users of do_each_thread().
Change them to use for_each_process_thread() and kill this helper.

There is a subtle change, after do_each_thread/while_each_thread g == t ==
&init_task, while after for_each_process_thread() they both point to
nowhere, but this doesn't matter.

> Why is for_each_process_thread() better than do_each_thread()?

Say, for_each_process_thread() is rcu safe, do_each_thread() is not.

And certainly

	for_each_process_thread(p, t) {
		do_something(p, t);
	}

looks better than

	do_each_thread(p, t) {
		do_something(p, t);
	} while_each_thread(p, t);

And again, there are only 3 users of this awkward helper left.  It should
have been killed years ago and in fact I thought it had already been
killed.  It uses while_each_thread() which needs some changes.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230817163708.GA8248@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Christian Brauner (Microsoft)" <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxxx> # tty/serial
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 arch/ia64/kernel/mca.c       |    4 ++--
 drivers/tty/tty_io.c         |    4 ++--
 fs/fs_struct.c               |    4 ++--
 include/linux/sched/signal.h |    7 -------
 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/mca.c~kill-do_each_thread
+++ a/arch/ia64/kernel/mca.c
@@ -1630,10 +1630,10 @@ default_monarch_init_process(struct noti
 	}
 	printk("\n\n");
 	if (read_trylock(&tasklist_lock)) {
-		do_each_thread (g, t) {
+		for_each_process_thread(g, t) {
 			printk("\nBacktrace of pid %d (%s)\n", t->pid, t->comm);
 			show_stack(t, NULL, KERN_DEFAULT);
-		} while_each_thread (g, t);
+		}
 		read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
 	}
 	/* FIXME: This will not restore zapped printk locks. */
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c~kill-do_each_thread
+++ a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
@@ -3031,7 +3031,7 @@ void __do_SAK(struct tty_struct *tty)
 	} while_each_pid_task(session, PIDTYPE_SID, p);
 
 	/* Now kill any processes that happen to have the tty open */
-	do_each_thread(g, p) {
+	for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
 		if (p->signal->tty == tty) {
 			tty_notice(tty, "SAK: killed process %d (%s): by controlling tty\n",
 				   task_pid_nr(p), p->comm);
@@ -3048,7 +3048,7 @@ void __do_SAK(struct tty_struct *tty)
 					PIDTYPE_SID);
 		}
 		task_unlock(p);
-	} while_each_thread(g, p);
+	}
 	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
 	put_pid(session);
 }
--- a/fs/fs_struct.c~kill-do_each_thread
+++ a/fs/fs_struct.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ void chroot_fs_refs(const struct path *o
 	int count = 0;
 
 	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
-	do_each_thread(g, p) {
+	for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
 		task_lock(p);
 		fs = p->fs;
 		if (fs) {
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ void chroot_fs_refs(const struct path *o
 			spin_unlock(&fs->lock);
 		}
 		task_unlock(p);
-	} while_each_thread(g, p);
+	}
 	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
 	while (count--)
 		path_put(old_root);
--- a/include/linux/sched/signal.h~kill-do_each_thread
+++ a/include/linux/sched/signal.h
@@ -648,13 +648,6 @@ extern void flush_itimer_signals(void);
 
 extern bool current_is_single_threaded(void);
 
-/*
- * Careful: do_each_thread/while_each_thread is a double loop so
- *          'break' will not work as expected - use goto instead.
- */
-#define do_each_thread(g, t) \
-	for (g = t = &init_task ; (g = t = next_task(g)) != &init_task ; ) do
-
 #define while_each_thread(g, t) \
 	while ((t = next_thread(t)) != g)
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from oleg@xxxxxxxxxx are

kill-do_each_thread.patch




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux