The quilt patch titled
Subject: mm/vmscan: fix root proactive reclaim unthrottling unbalanced node
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-vmscan-fix-root-proactive-reclaim-unthrottling-unbalanced-node.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/vmscan: fix root proactive reclaim unthrottling unbalanced node
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 02:31:01 +0000
When memory.reclaim was introduced, it became the first case where
cgroup_reclaim() is true for the root cgroup. Johannes concluded [1] that
for most cases this is okay, except for one case. Historically, kswapd
would throttle reclaim on a node if a lot of pages marked for reclaim are
under writeback (aka the node is congested). This occurred by setting
LRUVEC_CONGESTED bit in lruvec->flags. The bit would be cleared when the
node is balanced.
Similarly, cgroup reclaim would set the same bit when an lruvec is
congested, and clear it on the way out of reclaim (to throttle local
reclaimers).
Before the introduction of memory.reclaim, the root memcg was the only
target of kswapd reclaim, and non-root memcgs were the only targets of
cgroup reclaim, so they would never interfere. Using the same bit for
both was fine. After memory.reclaim, it is possible for cgroup reclaim on
the root cgroup to clear the bit set by kswapd. This would result in
reclaim on the node to be unthrottled before the node is balanced.
Fix this by introducing separate bits for cgroup-level and node-level
congestion. kswapd can unthrottle an lruvec that is marked as congested
by cgroup reclaim (as the entire node should no longer be congested), but
not vice versa (to prevent premature unthrottling before the entire node
is balanced).
[1]https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230405200150.GA35884@xxxxxxxxxxx/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230621023101.432780-1-yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230405200150.GA35884@xxxxxxxxxxx/
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/mmzone.h | 18 +++++++++++++++---
mm/vmscan.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h~mm-vmscan-fix-root-proactive-reclaim-unthrottling-unbalanced-node
+++ a/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -293,9 +293,21 @@ static inline bool is_active_lru(enum lr
#define ANON_AND_FILE 2
enum lruvec_flags {
- LRUVEC_CONGESTED, /* lruvec has many dirty pages
- * backed by a congested BDI
- */
+ /*
+ * An lruvec has many dirty pages backed by a congested BDI:
+ * 1. LRUVEC_CGROUP_CONGESTED is set by cgroup-level reclaim.
+ * It can be cleared by cgroup reclaim or kswapd.
+ * 2. LRUVEC_NODE_CONGESTED is set by kswapd node-level reclaim.
+ * It can only be cleared by kswapd.
+ *
+ * Essentially, kswapd can unthrottle an lruvec throttled by cgroup
+ * reclaim, but not vice versa. This only applies to the root cgroup.
+ * The goal is to prevent cgroup reclaim on the root cgroup (e.g.
+ * memory.reclaim) to unthrottle an unbalanced node (that was throttled
+ * by kswapd).
+ */
+ LRUVEC_CGROUP_CONGESTED,
+ LRUVEC_NODE_CONGESTED,
};
#endif /* !__GENERATING_BOUNDS_H */
--- a/mm/vmscan.c~mm-vmscan-fix-root-proactive-reclaim-unthrottling-unbalanced-node
+++ a/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -6578,10 +6578,13 @@ again:
* Legacy memcg will stall in page writeback so avoid forcibly
* stalling in reclaim_throttle().
*/
- if ((current_is_kswapd() ||
- (cgroup_reclaim(sc) && writeback_throttling_sane(sc))) &&
- sc->nr.dirty && sc->nr.dirty == sc->nr.congested)
- set_bit(LRUVEC_CONGESTED, &target_lruvec->flags);
+ if (sc->nr.dirty && sc->nr.dirty == sc->nr.congested) {
+ if (cgroup_reclaim(sc) && writeback_throttling_sane(sc))
+ set_bit(LRUVEC_CGROUP_CONGESTED, &target_lruvec->flags);
+
+ if (current_is_kswapd())
+ set_bit(LRUVEC_NODE_CONGESTED, &target_lruvec->flags);
+ }
/*
* Stall direct reclaim for IO completions if the lruvec is
@@ -6591,7 +6594,8 @@ again:
*/
if (!current_is_kswapd() && current_may_throttle() &&
!sc->hibernation_mode &&
- test_bit(LRUVEC_CONGESTED, &target_lruvec->flags))
+ (test_bit(LRUVEC_CGROUP_CONGESTED, &target_lruvec->flags) ||
+ test_bit(LRUVEC_NODE_CONGESTED, &target_lruvec->flags)))
reclaim_throttle(pgdat, VMSCAN_THROTTLE_CONGESTED);
if (should_continue_reclaim(pgdat, nr_node_reclaimed, sc))
@@ -6848,7 +6852,7 @@ retry:
lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(sc->target_mem_cgroup,
zone->zone_pgdat);
- clear_bit(LRUVEC_CONGESTED, &lruvec->flags);
+ clear_bit(LRUVEC_CGROUP_CONGESTED, &lruvec->flags);
}
}
@@ -7237,7 +7241,8 @@ static void clear_pgdat_congested(pg_dat
{
struct lruvec *lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(NULL, pgdat);
- clear_bit(LRUVEC_CONGESTED, &lruvec->flags);
+ clear_bit(LRUVEC_NODE_CONGESTED, &lruvec->flags);
+ clear_bit(LRUVEC_CGROUP_CONGESTED, &lruvec->flags);
clear_bit(PGDAT_DIRTY, &pgdat->flags);
clear_bit(PGDAT_WRITEBACK, &pgdat->flags);
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx are
