The quilt patch titled Subject: mm: page_alloc: split out FAIL_PAGE_ALLOC has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was mm-page_alloc-split-out-fail_page_alloc.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm ------------------------------------------------------ From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: mm: page_alloc: split out FAIL_PAGE_ALLOC Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 14:38:15 +0800 ... to a single file to reduce a bit of page_alloc.c. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230516063821.121844-8-wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- include/linux/fault-inject.h | 9 ++++ mm/Makefile | 1 mm/fail_page_alloc.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ mm/page_alloc.c | 74 --------------------------------- 4 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-) --- a/include/linux/fault-inject.h~mm-page_alloc-split-out-fail_page_alloc +++ a/include/linux/fault-inject.h @@ -93,6 +93,15 @@ struct kmem_cache; bool should_fail_alloc_page(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order); +#ifdef CONFIG_FAIL_PAGE_ALLOC +bool __should_fail_alloc_page(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order); +#else +static inline bool __should_fail_alloc_page(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order) +{ + return false; +} +#endif /* CONFIG_FAIL_PAGE_ALLOC */ + int should_failslab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags); #ifdef CONFIG_FAILSLAB extern bool __should_failslab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags); --- /dev/null +++ a/mm/fail_page_alloc.c @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +#include <linux/fault-inject.h> +#include <linux/mm.h> + +static struct { + struct fault_attr attr; + + bool ignore_gfp_highmem; + bool ignore_gfp_reclaim; + u32 min_order; +} fail_page_alloc = { + .attr = FAULT_ATTR_INITIALIZER, + .ignore_gfp_reclaim = true, + .ignore_gfp_highmem = true, + .min_order = 1, +}; + +static int __init setup_fail_page_alloc(char *str) +{ + return setup_fault_attr(&fail_page_alloc.attr, str); +} +__setup("fail_page_alloc=", setup_fail_page_alloc); + +bool __should_fail_alloc_page(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order) +{ + int flags = 0; + + if (order < fail_page_alloc.min_order) + return false; + if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL) + return false; + if (fail_page_alloc.ignore_gfp_highmem && (gfp_mask & __GFP_HIGHMEM)) + return false; + if (fail_page_alloc.ignore_gfp_reclaim && + (gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM)) + return false; + + /* See comment in __should_failslab() */ + if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOWARN) + flags |= FAULT_NOWARN; + + return should_fail_ex(&fail_page_alloc.attr, 1 << order, flags); +} + +#ifdef CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION_DEBUG_FS + +static int __init fail_page_alloc_debugfs(void) +{ + umode_t mode = S_IFREG | 0600; + struct dentry *dir; + + dir = fault_create_debugfs_attr("fail_page_alloc", NULL, + &fail_page_alloc.attr); + + debugfs_create_bool("ignore-gfp-wait", mode, dir, + &fail_page_alloc.ignore_gfp_reclaim); + debugfs_create_bool("ignore-gfp-highmem", mode, dir, + &fail_page_alloc.ignore_gfp_highmem); + debugfs_create_u32("min-order", mode, dir, &fail_page_alloc.min_order); + + return 0; +} + +late_initcall(fail_page_alloc_debugfs); + +#endif /* CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION_DEBUG_FS */ --- a/mm/Makefile~mm-page_alloc-split-out-fail_page_alloc +++ a/mm/Makefile @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_KASAN) += kasan/ obj-$(CONFIG_KFENCE) += kfence/ obj-$(CONFIG_KMSAN) += kmsan/ obj-$(CONFIG_FAILSLAB) += failslab.o +obj-$(CONFIG_FAIL_PAGE_ALLOC) += fail_page_alloc.o obj-$(CONFIG_MEMTEST) += memtest.o obj-$(CONFIG_MIGRATION) += migrate.o obj-$(CONFIG_NUMA) += memory-tiers.o --- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-page_alloc-split-out-fail_page_alloc +++ a/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -2994,80 +2994,6 @@ out: return page; } -#ifdef CONFIG_FAIL_PAGE_ALLOC - -static struct { - struct fault_attr attr; - - bool ignore_gfp_highmem; - bool ignore_gfp_reclaim; - u32 min_order; -} fail_page_alloc = { - .attr = FAULT_ATTR_INITIALIZER, - .ignore_gfp_reclaim = true, - .ignore_gfp_highmem = true, - .min_order = 1, -}; - -static int __init setup_fail_page_alloc(char *str) -{ - return setup_fault_attr(&fail_page_alloc.attr, str); -} -__setup("fail_page_alloc=", setup_fail_page_alloc); - -static bool __should_fail_alloc_page(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order) -{ - int flags = 0; - - if (order < fail_page_alloc.min_order) - return false; - if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL) - return false; - if (fail_page_alloc.ignore_gfp_highmem && (gfp_mask & __GFP_HIGHMEM)) - return false; - if (fail_page_alloc.ignore_gfp_reclaim && - (gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM)) - return false; - - /* See comment in __should_failslab() */ - if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOWARN) - flags |= FAULT_NOWARN; - - return should_fail_ex(&fail_page_alloc.attr, 1 << order, flags); -} - -#ifdef CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION_DEBUG_FS - -static int __init fail_page_alloc_debugfs(void) -{ - umode_t mode = S_IFREG | 0600; - struct dentry *dir; - - dir = fault_create_debugfs_attr("fail_page_alloc", NULL, - &fail_page_alloc.attr); - - debugfs_create_bool("ignore-gfp-wait", mode, dir, - &fail_page_alloc.ignore_gfp_reclaim); - debugfs_create_bool("ignore-gfp-highmem", mode, dir, - &fail_page_alloc.ignore_gfp_highmem); - debugfs_create_u32("min-order", mode, dir, &fail_page_alloc.min_order); - - return 0; -} - -late_initcall(fail_page_alloc_debugfs); - -#endif /* CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION_DEBUG_FS */ - -#else /* CONFIG_FAIL_PAGE_ALLOC */ - -static inline bool __should_fail_alloc_page(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order) -{ - return false; -} - -#endif /* CONFIG_FAIL_PAGE_ALLOC */ - noinline bool should_fail_alloc_page(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order) { return __should_fail_alloc_page(gfp_mask, order); _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx are