On 5/26/23 10:05 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 26 May 2023 09:36:25 +0800 Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi Andrew, >> >> There is an updated version v2, which describe more clearly about the >> case: >> https://lore.kernel.org/ocfs2-devel/e9fc4b2f-1fcc-7c31-f346-59eccff50f9b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u > > Sigh. Thanks. > > As you can see from the above link, the email never hit ocfs2-devel and > never hit my inbox. I'll piece it together from your reply. > Sorry for the inconvenience. I quote the updated description below: " It's trivial to trigger a use-after-free bug in the ocfs2 quotas code using fstest generic/452. After a read-only remount, quotas are suspended and ocfs2_mem_dqinfo is freed through ->ocfs2_local_free_info(). When unmounting the filesystem, an UAF access to the oinfo will eventually cause a crash. BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in timer_delete+0x54/0xc0 Read of size 8 at addr ffff8880389a8208 by task umount/669 ... Call Trace: <TASK> ... timer_delete+0x54/0xc0 try_to_grab_pending+0x31/0x230 __cancel_work_timer+0x6c/0x270 ocfs2_disable_quotas.isra.0+0x3e/0xf0 [ocfs2] ocfs2_dismount_volume+0xdd/0x450 [ocfs2] generic_shutdown_super+0xaa/0x280 kill_block_super+0x46/0x70 deactivate_locked_super+0x4d/0xb0 cleanup_mnt+0x135/0x1f0 ... </TASK> Allocated by task 632: kasan_save_stack+0x1c/0x40 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30 __kasan_kmalloc+0x8b/0x90 ocfs2_local_read_info+0xe3/0x9a0 [ocfs2] dquot_load_quota_sb+0x34b/0x680 dquot_load_quota_inode+0xfe/0x1a0 ocfs2_enable_quotas+0x190/0x2f0 [ocfs2] ocfs2_fill_super+0x14ef/0x2120 [ocfs2] mount_bdev+0x1be/0x200 legacy_get_tree+0x6c/0xb0 vfs_get_tree+0x3e/0x110 path_mount+0xa90/0xe10 __x64_sys_mount+0x16f/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x43/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc Freed by task 650: kasan_save_stack+0x1c/0x40 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30 kasan_save_free_info+0x2a/0x50 __kasan_slab_free+0xf9/0x150 __kmem_cache_free+0x89/0x180 ocfs2_local_free_info+0x2ba/0x3f0 [ocfs2] dquot_disable+0x35f/0xa70 ocfs2_susp_quotas.isra.0+0x159/0x1a0 [ocfs2] ocfs2_remount+0x150/0x580 [ocfs2] reconfigure_super+0x1a5/0x3a0 path_mount+0xc8a/0xe10 __x64_sys_mount+0x16f/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x43/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc " > The ocfs2-devel list is really bad. Can we move to a vger list? Or > get some maintenance work done on ocfs2-devel? > I see. It seems something wrong with ocfs2-devel. But I'm not an administrator of it:( Thanks, Joseph
