+ loongarch-drop-ranges-for-definition-of-arch_force_max_order.patch added to mm-unstable branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: loongarch: drop ranges for definition of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch.  Its filename is
     loongarch-drop-ranges-for-definition-of-arch_force_max_order.patch

This patch will shortly appear at
     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/loongarch-drop-ranges-for-definition-of-arch_force_max_order.patch

This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: loongarch: drop ranges for definition of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 10:17:27 +0200

LoongArch defines insane ranges for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER allowing
MAX_ORDER up to 63, which implies maximal contiguous allocation size of
2^63 pages.

Drop bogus definitions of ranges for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER and leave it a
simple integer with sensible defaults.

Users that *really* need to change the value of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER will
be able to do so but they won't be mislead by the bogus ranges.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230322081727.2516291-1-rppt@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: WANG Xuerui <kernel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---


--- a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig~loongarch-drop-ranges-for-definition-of-arch_force_max_order
+++ a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
@@ -420,11 +420,8 @@ config NODES_SHIFT
 
 config ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER
 	int "Maximum zone order"
-	range 13 63 if PAGE_SIZE_64KB
 	default "13" if PAGE_SIZE_64KB
-	range 11 63 if PAGE_SIZE_16KB
 	default "11" if PAGE_SIZE_16KB
-	range 10 63
 	default "10"
 	help
 	  The kernel memory allocator divides physically contiguous memory
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from rppt@xxxxxxxxxx are

loongarch-drop-ranges-for-definition-of-arch_force_max_order.patch
mm-move-get_page_from_free_area-to-mm-page_allocc.patch
mips-fix-comment-about-pgtable_init.patch
mm-page_alloc-add-helper-for-checking-if-check_pages_enabled.patch
mm-move-most-of-core-mm-initialization-to-mm-mm_initc.patch
mm-handle-hashdist-initialization-in-mm-mm_initc.patch
mm-page_alloc-rename-page_alloc_init-to-page_alloc_init_cpuhp.patch
init-fold-build_all_zonelists-and-page_alloc_init_cpuhp-to-mm_init.patch
initmm-move-mm_init-to-mm-mm_initc-and-rename-it-to-mm_core_init.patch
mm-call-ptlockpgtable_cache_init-directly-from-mm_core_init.patch
mm-move-init_mem_debugging_and_hardening-to-mm-mm_initc.patch
initmm-fold-late-call-to-page_ext_init-to-page_alloc_init_late.patch
mm-move-mem_init_print_info-to-mm_initc.patch
mm-move-kmem_cache_init-declaration-to-mm-slabh.patch
mm-move-vmalloc_init-declaration-to-mm-internalh.patch
maintainers-extend-memblock-entry-to-include-mm-initialization.patch




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux