Re: + zram-show-zsmalloc-objs_moved-stat-in-mm_stat-fix.patch added to mm-unstable branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Andrew,

On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 5:31 AM Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The patch titled
>      Subject: zram: use atomic_long_read() to read atomic_long_t
> has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch.  Its filename is
>      zram-show-zsmalloc-objs_moved-stat-in-mm_stat-fix.patch
>
> This patch will shortly appear at
>      https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/zram-show-zsmalloc-objs_moved-stat-in-mm_stat-fix.patch
>
> This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
>
> Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
>    a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
>    b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
>    c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
>       reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
>
> *** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
>
> The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
> branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
> and is updated there every 2-3 working days
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: zram: use atomic_long_read() to read atomic_long_t
> Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2023 13:15:23 +0100
>
> On 32-bit:
>
>     drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c: In function `mm_stat_show':
>     drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c:1234:23: error: passing argument 1 of `atomic64_read' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
>      1234 |    (u64)atomic64_read(&pool_stats.objs_moved));
>           |                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>           |                       |
>           |                       atomic_long_t * {aka struct <anonymous> *}
>     In file included from ./include/linux/atomic.h:82,
>                      from ./include/linux/mm_types_task.h:13,
>                      from ./include/linux/mm_types.h:5,
>                      from ./include/linux/buildid.h:5,
>                      from ./include/linux/module.h:14,
>                      from drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c:18:
>     ./include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h:644:33: note: expected `const atomic64_t *' {aka `const struct <anonymous> *'} but argument is of type `atomic_long_t *' {aka `struct <anonymous> *'}
>       644 | atomic64_read(const atomic64_t *v)
>           |               ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
>
> Fix this by using atomic_long_read() instead.
>
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230225121523.3288544-1-geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx
> Fixes: b7d89654a988a2a4 ("zram: show zsmalloc objs_moved stat in mm_stat")
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by; <noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Oops, I accidentally typed a semicolon instead of a colon.
That's actually better, as the noreply address is a real noreply
address, and bounces ;-)

> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux