The quilt patch titled
Subject: mm/kmemleak: simplify kmemleak_cond_resched() usage
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-kmemleak-simplify-kmemleak_cond_resched-usage.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/kmemleak: simplify kmemleak_cond_resched() usage
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 23:01:10 -0500
Patch series "mm/kmemleak: Simplify kmemleak_cond_resched() & fix UAF", v2.
It was found that a KASAN use-after-free error was reported in the
kmemleak_scan() function. After further examination, it is believe that
even though a reference is taken from the current object, it does not
prevent the object pointed to by the next pointer from going away after a
cond_resched().
To fix that, additional flags are added to make sure that the current
object won't be removed from the object_list during the duration of the
cond_resched() to ensure the validity of the next pointer.
While making the change, I also simplify the current usage of
kmemleak_cond_resched() to make it easier to understand.
This patch (of 2):
The presence of a pinned argument and the 64k loop count make
kmemleak_cond_resched() a bit more complex to read. The pinned argument
is used only by first kmemleak_scan() loop.
Simplify the usage of kmemleak_cond_resched() by removing the pinned
argument and always do a get_object()/put_object() sequence. In addition,
the 64k loop is removed by using need_resched() to decide if
kmemleak_cond_resched() should be called.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230119040111.350923-1-longman@xxxxxxxxxx
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230119040111.350923-2-longman@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
--- a/mm/kmemleak.c~mm-kmemleak-simplify-kmemleak_cond_resched-usage
+++ a/mm/kmemleak.c
@@ -1472,22 +1472,17 @@ static void scan_gray_list(void)
/*
* Conditionally call resched() in an object iteration loop while making sure
* that the given object won't go away without RCU read lock by performing a
- * get_object() if !pinned.
- *
- * Return: false if can't do a cond_resched() due to get_object() failure
- * true otherwise
+ * get_object() if necessaary.
*/
-static bool kmemleak_cond_resched(struct kmemleak_object *object, bool pinned)
+static void kmemleak_cond_resched(struct kmemleak_object *object)
{
- if (!pinned && !get_object(object))
- return false;
+ if (!get_object(object))
+ return; /* Try next object */
rcu_read_unlock();
cond_resched();
rcu_read_lock();
- if (!pinned)
- put_object(object);
- return true;
+ put_object(object);
}
/*
@@ -1501,15 +1496,12 @@ static void kmemleak_scan(void)
struct zone *zone;
int __maybe_unused i;
int new_leaks = 0;
- int loop_cnt = 0;
jiffies_last_scan = jiffies;
/* prepare the kmemleak_object's */
rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(object, &object_list, object_list) {
- bool obj_pinned = false;
-
raw_spin_lock_irq(&object->lock);
#ifdef DEBUG
/*
@@ -1535,19 +1527,13 @@ static void kmemleak_scan(void)
/* reset the reference count (whiten the object) */
object->count = 0;
- if (color_gray(object) && get_object(object)) {
+ if (color_gray(object) && get_object(object))
list_add_tail(&object->gray_list, &gray_list);
- obj_pinned = true;
- }
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&object->lock);
- /*
- * Do a cond_resched() every 64k objects to avoid soft lockup.
- */
- if (!(++loop_cnt & 0xffff) &&
- !kmemleak_cond_resched(object, obj_pinned))
- loop_cnt--; /* Try again on next object */
+ if (need_resched())
+ kmemleak_cond_resched(object);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -1614,14 +1600,9 @@ static void kmemleak_scan(void)
* scan and color them gray until the next scan.
*/
rcu_read_lock();
- loop_cnt = 0;
list_for_each_entry_rcu(object, &object_list, object_list) {
- /*
- * Do a cond_resched() every 64k objects to avoid soft lockup.
- */
- if (!(++loop_cnt & 0xffff) &&
- !kmemleak_cond_resched(object, false))
- loop_cnt--; /* Try again on next object */
+ if (need_resched())
+ kmemleak_cond_resched(object);
/*
* This is racy but we can save the overhead of lock/unlock
@@ -1656,14 +1637,9 @@ static void kmemleak_scan(void)
* Scanning result reporting.
*/
rcu_read_lock();
- loop_cnt = 0;
list_for_each_entry_rcu(object, &object_list, object_list) {
- /*
- * Do a cond_resched() every 64k objects to avoid soft lockup.
- */
- if (!(++loop_cnt & 0xffff) &&
- !kmemleak_cond_resched(object, false))
- loop_cnt--; /* Try again on next object */
+ if (need_resched())
+ kmemleak_cond_resched(object);
/*
* This is racy but we can save the overhead of lock/unlock
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from longman@xxxxxxxxxx are
