The patch titled
Subject: ext4: convert mext_page_double_lock() to mext_folio_double_lock()
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is
ext4-convert-mext_page_double_lock-to-mext_folio_double_lock.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/ext4-convert-mext_page_double_lock-to-mext_folio_double_lock.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: "Vishal Moola (Oracle)" <vishal.moola@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: ext4: convert mext_page_double_lock() to mext_folio_double_lock()
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 10:10:09 -0800
Convert mext_page_double_lock() to use folios. This change saves 146
bytes of kernel text. It also removes 6 calls to compound_head() and 2
calls to folio_file_page().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221207181009.4016-1-vishal.moola@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ext4/move_extent.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c~ext4-convert-mext_page_double_lock-to-mext_folio_double_lock
+++ a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
@@ -110,22 +110,23 @@ out:
}
/**
- * mext_page_double_lock - Grab and lock pages on both @inode1 and @inode2
+ * mext_folio_double_lock - Grab and lock folio on both @inode1 and @inode2
*
* @inode1: the inode structure
* @inode2: the inode structure
- * @index1: page index
- * @index2: page index
- * @page: result page vector
+ * @index1: folio index
+ * @index2: folio index
+ * @folio: result folio vector
*
- * Grab two locked pages for inode's by inode order
+ * Grab two locked folio for inode's by inode order
*/
static int
-mext_page_double_lock(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2,
- pgoff_t index1, pgoff_t index2, struct page *page[2])
+mext_folio_double_lock(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2,
+ pgoff_t index1, pgoff_t index2, struct folio *folio[2])
{
struct address_space *mapping[2];
unsigned int flags;
+ unsigned fgp_flags = FGP_LOCK | FGP_WRITE | FGP_CREAT | FGP_STABLE;
BUG_ON(!inode1 || !inode2);
if (inode1 < inode2) {
@@ -138,28 +139,30 @@ mext_page_double_lock(struct inode *inod
}
flags = memalloc_nofs_save();
- page[0] = grab_cache_page_write_begin(mapping[0], index1);
- if (!page[0]) {
+ folio[0] = __filemap_get_folio(mapping[0], index1, fgp_flags,
+ mapping_gfp_mask(mapping[0]));
+ if (!folio[0]) {
memalloc_nofs_restore(flags);
return -ENOMEM;
}
- page[1] = grab_cache_page_write_begin(mapping[1], index2);
+ folio[1] = __filemap_get_folio(mapping[1], index2, fgp_flags,
+ mapping_gfp_mask(mapping[1]));
memalloc_nofs_restore(flags);
- if (!page[1]) {
- unlock_page(page[0]);
- put_page(page[0]);
+ if (!folio[1]) {
+ folio_unlock(folio[0]);
+ folio_put(folio[0]);
return -ENOMEM;
}
/*
- * grab_cache_page_write_begin() may not wait on page's writeback if
+ * __filemap_get_folio() may not wait on folio's writeback if
* BDI not demand that. But it is reasonable to be very conservative
- * here and explicitly wait on page's writeback
+ * here and explicitly wait on folio's writeback
*/
- wait_on_page_writeback(page[0]);
- wait_on_page_writeback(page[1]);
+ folio_wait_writeback(folio[0]);
+ folio_wait_writeback(folio[1]);
if (inode1 > inode2)
- swap(page[0], page[1]);
+ swap(folio[0], folio[1]);
return 0;
}
@@ -252,7 +255,6 @@ move_extent_per_page(struct file *o_filp
int block_len_in_page, int unwritten, int *err)
{
struct inode *orig_inode = file_inode(o_filp);
- struct page *pagep[2] = {NULL, NULL};
struct folio *folio[2] = {NULL, NULL};
handle_t *handle;
ext4_lblk_t orig_blk_offset, donor_blk_offset;
@@ -303,8 +305,8 @@ again:
replaced_size = data_size;
- *err = mext_page_double_lock(orig_inode, donor_inode, orig_page_offset,
- donor_page_offset, pagep);
+ *err = mext_folio_double_lock(orig_inode, donor_inode, orig_page_offset,
+ donor_page_offset, folio);
if (unlikely(*err < 0))
goto stop_journal;
/*
@@ -314,8 +316,6 @@ again:
* hold page's lock, if it is still the case data copy is not
* necessary, just swap data blocks between orig and donor.
*/
- folio[0] = page_folio(pagep[0]);
- folio[1] = page_folio(pagep[1]);
VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_large(folio[0]), folio[0]);
VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_large(folio[1]), folio[1]);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from vishal.moola@xxxxxxxxx are
mm-memory-add-vm_normal_folio.patch
madvise-convert-madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range-to-use-folios.patch
mm-damon-convert-damon_pa_mark_accessed_or_deactivate-to-use-folios.patch
mm-swap-convert-deactivate_page-to-folio_deactivate.patch
ext4-convert-mext_page_double_lock-to-mext_folio_double_lock.patch
