The quilt patch titled
Subject: test_kprobes: fix implicit declaration error of test_kprobes
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
test_kprobes-fix-implicit-declaration-error-of-test_kprobes.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-hotfixes-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: Li Hua <hucool.lihua@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: test_kprobes: fix implicit declaration error of test_kprobes
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 11:06:20 +0800
If KPROBES_SANITY_TEST and ARCH_CORRECT_STACKTRACE_ON_KRETPROBE is enabled, but
STACKTRACE is not set. Build failed as below:
lib/test_kprobes.c: In function `stacktrace_return_handler':
lib/test_kprobes.c:228:8: error: implicit declaration of function `stack_trace_save'; did you mean `stacktrace_driver'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
ret = stack_trace_save(stack_buf, STACK_BUF_SIZE, 0);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
stacktrace_driver
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
scripts/Makefile.build:250: recipe for target 'lib/test_kprobes.o' failed
make[2]: *** [lib/test_kprobes.o] Error 1
To fix this error, Select STACKTRACE if ARCH_CORRECT_STACKTRACE_ON_KRETPROBE is enabled.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221121030620.63181-1-hucool.lihua@xxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 1f6d3a8f5e39 ("kprobes: Add a test case for stacktrace from kretprobe handler")
Signed-off-by: Li Hua <hucool.lihua@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
lib/Kconfig.debug | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug~test_kprobes-fix-implicit-declaration-error-of-test_kprobes
+++ a/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -2107,6 +2107,7 @@ config KPROBES_SANITY_TEST
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
depends on KPROBES
depends on KUNIT
+ select STACKTRACE if ARCH_CORRECT_STACKTRACE_ON_KRETPROBE
default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
help
This option provides for testing basic kprobes functionality on
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from hucool.lihua@xxxxxxxxxx are
