The quilt patch titled
Subject: memblock,arm64: expand the static memblock memory table
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
memblockarm64-expand-the-static-memblock-memory-table.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: Zhou Guanghui <zhouguanghui1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: memblock,arm64: expand the static memblock memory table
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 10:27:42 +0000
In a system(Huawei Ascend ARM64 SoC) using HBM, a multi-bit ECC error
occurs, and the BIOS will mark the corresponding area (for example, 2 MB)
as unusable. When the system restarts next time, these areas are not
reported or reported as EFI_UNUSABLE_MEMORY. Both cases lead to an
increase in the number of memblocks, whereas EFI_UNUSABLE_MEMORY leads to
a larger number of memblocks.
For example, if the EFI_UNUSABLE_MEMORY type is reported:
...
memory[0x92] [0x0000200834a00000-0x0000200835bfffff], 0x0000000001200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x0
memory[0x93] [0x0000200835c00000-0x0000200835dfffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x4
memory[0x94] [0x0000200835e00000-0x00002008367fffff], 0x0000000000a00000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x0
memory[0x95] [0x0000200836800000-0x00002008369fffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x4
memory[0x96] [0x0000200836a00000-0x0000200837bfffff], 0x0000000001200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x0
memory[0x97] [0x0000200837c00000-0x0000200837dfffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x4
memory[0x98] [0x0000200837e00000-0x000020087fffffff], 0x0000000048200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x0
memory[0x99] [0x0000200880000000-0x0000200bcfffffff], 0x0000000350000000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x0
memory[0x9a] [0x0000200bd0000000-0x0000200bd01fffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x4
memory[0x9b] [0x0000200bd0200000-0x0000200bd07fffff], 0x0000000000600000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x0
memory[0x9c] [0x0000200bd0800000-0x0000200bd09fffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x4
memory[0x9d] [0x0000200bd0a00000-0x0000200fcfffffff], 0x00000003ff600000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x0
memory[0x9e] [0x0000200fd0000000-0x0000200fd01fffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x4
memory[0x9f] [0x0000200fd0200000-0x0000200fffffffff], 0x000000002fe00000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x0
...
The EFI memory map is parsed to construct the memblock arrays before the
memblock arrays can be resized. As the result, memory regions beyond
INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS are lost.
Add a new macro INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS to replace
INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGTIONS to define the size of the static memblock.memory
array.
Allow overriding memblock.memory array size with architecture defined
INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS and make arm64 to set
INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS to 1024 when CONFIG_EFI is enabled.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220615102742.96450-1-zhouguanghui1@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Zhou Guanghui <zhouguanghui1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Darren Hart <darren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> [arm64]
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Xu Qiang <xuqiang36@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h | 9 +++++++++
mm/memblock.c | 14 +++++++++-----
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h~memblockarm64-expand-the-static-memblock-memory-table
+++ a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
@@ -364,6 +364,15 @@ void dump_mem_limit(void);
# define INIT_MEMBLOCK_RESERVED_REGIONS (INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + NR_CPUS + 1)
#endif
+/*
+ * memory regions which marked with flag MEMBLOCK_NOMAP(for example, the memory
+ * of the EFI_UNUSABLE_MEMORY type) may divide a continuous memory block into
+ * multiple parts. As a result, the number of memory regions is large.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_EFI
+#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS (INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS * 8)
+#endif
+
#include <asm-generic/memory_model.h>
#endif /* __ASM_MEMORY_H */
--- a/mm/memblock.c~memblockarm64-expand-the-static-memblock-memory-table
+++ a/mm/memblock.c
@@ -29,6 +29,10 @@
# define INIT_MEMBLOCK_RESERVED_REGIONS INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS
#endif
+#ifndef INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS
+#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS
+#endif
+
/**
* DOC: memblock overview
*
@@ -55,9 +59,9 @@
* the allocator metadata. The "memory" and "reserved" types are nicely
* wrapped with struct memblock. This structure is statically
* initialized at build time. The region arrays are initially sized to
- * %INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS for "memory" and %INIT_MEMBLOCK_RESERVED_REGIONS
- * for "reserved". The region array for "physmem" is initially sized to
- * %INIT_PHYSMEM_REGIONS.
+ * %INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS for "memory" and
+ * %INIT_MEMBLOCK_RESERVED_REGIONS for "reserved". The region array
+ * for "physmem" is initially sized to %INIT_PHYSMEM_REGIONS.
* The memblock_allow_resize() enables automatic resizing of the region
* arrays during addition of new regions. This feature should be used
* with care so that memory allocated for the region array will not
@@ -102,7 +106,7 @@ unsigned long min_low_pfn;
unsigned long max_pfn;
unsigned long long max_possible_pfn;
-static struct memblock_region memblock_memory_init_regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS] __initdata_memblock;
+static struct memblock_region memblock_memory_init_regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS] __initdata_memblock;
static struct memblock_region memblock_reserved_init_regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_RESERVED_REGIONS] __initdata_memblock;
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP
static struct memblock_region memblock_physmem_init_regions[INIT_PHYSMEM_REGIONS];
@@ -111,7 +115,7 @@ static struct memblock_region memblock_p
struct memblock memblock __initdata_memblock = {
.memory.regions = memblock_memory_init_regions,
.memory.cnt = 1, /* empty dummy entry */
- .memory.max = INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS,
+ .memory.max = INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS,
.memory.name = "memory",
.reserved.regions = memblock_reserved_init_regions,
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from zhouguanghui1@xxxxxxxxxx are
