The quilt patch titled
Subject: userfaultfd: provide properly masked address for huge-pages
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
userfaultfd-provide-properly-masked-address-for-huge-pages.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-hotfixes-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: Nadav Amit <namit@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: userfaultfd: provide properly masked address for huge-pages
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 09:59:06 -0700
Commit 824ddc601adc ("userfaultfd: provide unmasked address on
page-fault") was introduced to fix an old bug, in which the offset in the
address of a page-fault was masked. Concerns were raised - although were
never backed by actual code - that some userspace code might break because
the bug has been around for quite a while. To address these concerns a
new flag was introduced, and only when this flag is set by the user,
userfaultfd provides the exact address of the page-fault.
The commit however had a bug, and if the flag is unset, the offset was
always masked based on a base-page granularity. Yet, for huge-pages, the
behavior prior to the commit was that the address is masked to the
huge-page granulrity.
While there are no reports on real breakage, fix this issue. If the flag
is unset, use the address with the masking that was done before.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220711165906.2682-1-namit@xxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 824ddc601adc ("userfaultfd: provide unmasked address on page-fault")
Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/userfaultfd.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c~userfaultfd-provide-properly-masked-address-for-huge-pages
+++ a/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -192,17 +192,19 @@ static inline void msg_init(struct uffd_
}
static inline struct uffd_msg userfault_msg(unsigned long address,
+ unsigned long real_address,
unsigned int flags,
unsigned long reason,
unsigned int features)
{
struct uffd_msg msg;
+
msg_init(&msg);
msg.event = UFFD_EVENT_PAGEFAULT;
- if (!(features & UFFD_FEATURE_EXACT_ADDRESS))
- address &= PAGE_MASK;
- msg.arg.pagefault.address = address;
+ msg.arg.pagefault.address = (features & UFFD_FEATURE_EXACT_ADDRESS) ?
+ real_address : address;
+
/*
* These flags indicate why the userfault occurred:
* - UFFD_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WP indicates a write protect fault.
@@ -488,8 +490,8 @@ vm_fault_t handle_userfault(struct vm_fa
init_waitqueue_func_entry(&uwq.wq, userfaultfd_wake_function);
uwq.wq.private = current;
- uwq.msg = userfault_msg(vmf->real_address, vmf->flags, reason,
- ctx->features);
+ uwq.msg = userfault_msg(vmf->address, vmf->real_address, vmf->flags,
+ reason, ctx->features);
uwq.ctx = ctx;
uwq.waken = false;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from namit@xxxxxxxxxx are
