[to-be-updated] resource-re-factor-page_is_ram.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The quilt patch titled
     Subject: resource: re-factor page_is_ram()
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     resource-re-factor-page_is_ram.patch

This patch was dropped because an updated version will be merged

------------------------------------------------------
From: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: resource: re-factor page_is_ram()
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 22:02:43 +0530

Presently page_is_ram() relies on walk_system_ram_range() that performs a
walk on kernel iomem resources hierarchy with a dummy callback __is_ram().
Before calling find_next_iomem_res(), walk_system_ram_range() does some
book-keeping which can be avoided for page_is_ram() use-case.

Hence this patch proposes to update page_is_ram() to directly call
find_next_iomem_res() with minimal book-keeping needed.

To avoid allocating a 'struct resource' the patch also updates
find_next_iomem_res() to not return -EINVAL in case 'res == NULL'. 
Instead our 'struct resource *res' is only populated when its not NULL.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220601163243.3806231-1-vaibhav@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 kernel/resource.c |   19 ++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/resource.c~resource-re-factor-page_is_ram
+++ a/kernel/resource.c
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_resource);
  *
  * If a resource is found, returns 0 and @*res is overwritten with the part
  * of the resource that's within [@start..@end]; if none is found, returns
- * -ENODEV.  Returns -EINVAL for invalid parameters.
+ * -ENODEV.
  *
  * @start:	start address of the resource searched for
  * @end:	end address of same resource
@@ -328,9 +328,6 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_
 {
 	struct resource *p;
 
-	if (!res)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	if (start >= end)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
@@ -356,7 +353,7 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_
 		break;
 	}
 
-	if (p) {
+	if (p && res) {
 		/* copy data */
 		*res = (struct resource) {
 			.start = max(start, p->start),
@@ -474,18 +471,18 @@ int walk_system_ram_range(unsigned long
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int __is_ram(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, void *arg)
-{
-	return 1;
-}
-
 /*
  * This generic page_is_ram() returns true if specified address is
  * registered as System RAM in iomem_resource list.
  */
 int __weak page_is_ram(unsigned long pfn)
 {
-	return walk_system_ram_range(pfn, 1, NULL, __is_ram) == 1;
+	const resource_size_t pfn_res = PFN_PHYS(pfn);
+
+	return find_next_iomem_res(pfn_res,
+				   pfn_res + 1,
+				   IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY,
+				   IORES_DESC_NONE, NULL) == 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(page_is_ram);
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from vaibhav@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux