[to-be-updated] mm-hugetlb-check-gigantic_page_runtime_supported-in-return_unused_surplus_pages.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The quilt patch titled
     Subject: mm/hugetlb: check gigantic_page_runtime_supported() in return_unused_surplus_pages()
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-hugetlb-check-gigantic_page_runtime_supported-in-return_unused_surplus_pages.patch

This patch was dropped because an updated version will be merged

------------------------------------------------------
From: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@xxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/hugetlb: check gigantic_page_runtime_supported() in return_unused_surplus_pages()
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 14:36:46 +0900

Patch series "mm, hwpoison: enable 1GB hugepage support", v5.


This patch (of 8):

I found a weird state of 1GB hugepage pool, caused by the following
procedure:

  - run a process reserving all free 1GB hugepages,
  - shrink free 1GB hugepage pool to zero (i.e. writing 0 to
    /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-1048576kB/nr_hugepages), then
  - kill the reserving process.

, then all the hugepages are free *and* surplus at the same time.

  $ cat /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-1048576kB/nr_hugepages
  3
  $ cat /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-1048576kB/free_hugepages
  3
  $ cat /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-1048576kB/resv_hugepages
  0
  $ cat /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-1048576kB/surplus_hugepages
  3

This state is resolved by reserving and allocating the pages then freeing
them again, so this seems not to result in serious problem.  But it's a
little surprising (shrinking pool suddenly fails).

This behavior is caused by hstate_is_gigantic() check in
return_unused_surplus_pages().  This was introduced so long ago in 2008 by
commit aa888a74977a ("hugetlb: support larger than MAX_ORDER"), and at
that time the gigantic pages were not supposed to be allocated/freed at
run-time.  Now kernel can support runtime allocation/free, so let's check
gigantic_page_runtime_supported() together.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220708053653.964464-1-naoya.horiguchi@xxxxxxxxx
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220708053653.964464-2-naoya.horiguchi@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@xxxxxxx>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/hugetlb.c |    3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/hugetlb.c~mm-hugetlb-check-gigantic_page_runtime_supported-in-return_unused_surplus_pages
+++ a/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -2432,8 +2432,7 @@ static void return_unused_surplus_pages(
 	/* Uncommit the reservation */
 	h->resv_huge_pages -= unused_resv_pages;
 
-	/* Cannot return gigantic pages currently */
-	if (hstate_is_gigantic(h))
+	if (hstate_is_gigantic(h) && !gigantic_page_runtime_supported())
 		goto out;
 
 	/*
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from naoya.horiguchi@xxxxxxx are

mm-hugetlb-separate-path-for-hwpoison-entry-in-copy_hugetlb_page_range.patch
mm-hugetlb-make-pud_huge-and-follow_huge_pud-aware-of-non-present-pud-entry.patch
mm-hwpoison-hugetlb-support-saving-mechanism-of-raw-error-pages.patch
mm-hwpoison-make-unpoison-aware-of-raw-error-info-in-hwpoisoned-hugepage.patch
mm-hwpoison-set-pg_hwpoison-for-busy-hugetlb-pages.patch
mm-hwpoison-make-__page_handle_poison-returns-int.patch
mm-hwpoison-skip-raw-hwpoison-page-in-freeing-1gb-hugepage.patch
mm-hwpoison-enable-memory-error-handling-on-1gb-hugepage.patch




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux