The quilt patch titled
Subject: vmscan: remove remaining uses of page in shrink_page_list
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
vmscan-remove-remaining-uses-of-page-in-shrink_page_list.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch\nof git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: vmscan: remove remaining uses of page in shrink_page_list
These are all straightforward conversions to the folio API.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220504182857.4013401-16-willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/vmscan.c~vmscan-remove-remaining-uses-of-page-in-shrink_page_list
+++ a/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1507,11 +1507,11 @@ static unsigned int demote_page_list(str
return nr_succeeded;
}
-static bool may_enter_fs(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp_mask)
+static bool may_enter_fs(struct folio *folio, gfp_t gfp_mask)
{
if (gfp_mask & __GFP_FS)
return true;
- if (!PageSwapCache(page) || !(gfp_mask & __GFP_IO))
+ if (!folio_test_swapcache(folio) || !(gfp_mask & __GFP_IO))
return false;
/*
* We can "enter_fs" for swap-cache with only __GFP_IO
@@ -1520,7 +1520,7 @@ static bool may_enter_fs(struct page *pa
* but that will never affect SWP_FS_OPS, so the data_race
* is safe.
*/
- return !data_race(page_swap_flags(page) & SWP_FS_OPS);
+ return !data_race(page_swap_flags(&folio->page) & SWP_FS_OPS);
}
/*
@@ -1547,7 +1547,6 @@ static unsigned int shrink_page_list(str
retry:
while (!list_empty(page_list)) {
struct address_space *mapping;
- struct page *page;
struct folio *folio;
enum page_references references = PAGEREF_RECLAIM;
bool dirty, writeback;
@@ -1557,19 +1556,18 @@ retry:
folio = lru_to_folio(page_list);
list_del(&folio->lru);
- page = &folio->page;
- if (!trylock_page(page))
+ if (!folio_trylock(folio))
goto keep;
- VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageActive(page), page);
+ VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_active(folio), folio);
- nr_pages = compound_nr(page);
+ nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
- /* Account the number of base pages even though THP */
+ /* Account the number of base pages */
sc->nr_scanned += nr_pages;
- if (unlikely(!page_evictable(page)))
+ if (unlikely(!folio_evictable(folio)))
goto activate_locked;
if (!sc->may_unmap && folio_mapped(folio))
@@ -1578,7 +1576,7 @@ retry:
/*
* The number of dirty pages determines if a node is marked
* reclaim_congested. kswapd will stall and start writing
- * pages if the tail of the LRU is all dirty unqueued pages.
+ * folios if the tail of the LRU is all dirty unqueued folios.
*/
folio_check_dirty_writeback(folio, &dirty, &writeback);
if (dirty || writeback)
@@ -1588,21 +1586,21 @@ retry:
stat->nr_unqueued_dirty += nr_pages;
/*
- * Treat this page as congested if
- * pages are cycling through the LRU so quickly that the
- * pages marked for immediate reclaim are making it to the
- * end of the LRU a second time.
+ * Treat this folio as congested if folios are cycling
+ * through the LRU so quickly that the folios marked
+ * for immediate reclaim are making it to the end of
+ * the LRU a second time.
*/
- if (writeback && PageReclaim(page))
+ if (writeback && folio_test_reclaim(folio))
stat->nr_congested += nr_pages;
/*
* If a folio at the tail of the LRU is under writeback, there
* are three cases to consider.
*
- * 1) If reclaim is encountering an excessive number of folios
- * under writeback and this folio is both under
- * writeback and has the reclaim flag set then it
+ * 1) If reclaim is encountering an excessive number
+ * of folios under writeback and this folio has both
+ * the writeback and reclaim flags set, then it
* indicates that folios are being queued for I/O but
* are being recycled through the LRU before the I/O
* can complete. Waiting on the folio itself risks an
@@ -1651,19 +1649,19 @@ retry:
/* Case 2 above */
} else if (writeback_throttling_sane(sc) ||
!folio_test_reclaim(folio) ||
- !may_enter_fs(page, sc->gfp_mask)) {
+ !may_enter_fs(folio, sc->gfp_mask)) {
/*
* This is slightly racy -
- * folio_end_writeback() might have just
- * cleared the reclaim flag, then setting
- * reclaim here ends up interpreted as
- * the readahead flag - but that does
- * not matter enough to care. What we
- * do want is for this folio to have
- * the reclaim flag set next time memcg
- * reclaim reaches the tests above, so
- * it will then folio_wait_writeback()
- * to avoid OOM; and it's also appropriate
+ * folio_end_writeback() might have
+ * just cleared the reclaim flag, then
+ * setting the reclaim flag here ends up
+ * interpreted as the readahead flag - but
+ * that does not matter enough to care.
+ * What we do want is for this folio to
+ * have the reclaim flag set next time
+ * memcg reclaim reaches the tests above,
+ * so it will then wait for writeback to
+ * avoid OOM; and it's also appropriate
* in global reclaim.
*/
folio_set_reclaim(folio);
@@ -1691,37 +1689,37 @@ retry:
goto keep_locked;
case PAGEREF_RECLAIM:
case PAGEREF_RECLAIM_CLEAN:
- ; /* try to reclaim the page below */
+ ; /* try to reclaim the folio below */
}
/*
- * Before reclaiming the page, try to relocate
+ * Before reclaiming the folio, try to relocate
* its contents to another node.
*/
if (do_demote_pass &&
- (thp_migration_supported() || !PageTransHuge(page))) {
- list_add(&page->lru, &demote_pages);
- unlock_page(page);
+ (thp_migration_supported() || !folio_test_large(folio))) {
+ list_add(&folio->lru, &demote_pages);
+ folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
/*
* Anonymous process memory has backing store?
* Try to allocate it some swap space here.
- * Lazyfree page could be freed directly
+ * Lazyfree folio could be freed directly
*/
- if (PageAnon(page) && PageSwapBacked(page)) {
- if (!PageSwapCache(page)) {
+ if (folio_test_anon(folio) && folio_test_swapbacked(folio)) {
+ if (!folio_test_swapcache(folio)) {
if (!(sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_IO))
goto keep_locked;
if (folio_maybe_dma_pinned(folio))
goto keep_locked;
- if (PageTransHuge(page)) {
- /* cannot split THP, skip it */
+ if (folio_test_large(folio)) {
+ /* cannot split folio, skip it */
if (!can_split_folio(folio, NULL))
goto activate_locked;
/*
- * Split pages without a PMD map right
+ * Split folios without a PMD map right
* away. Chances are some or all of the
* tail pages can be freed without IO.
*/
@@ -1744,20 +1742,19 @@ retry:
goto activate_locked_split;
}
}
- } else if (PageSwapBacked(page) && PageTransHuge(page)) {
- /* Split shmem THP */
+ } else if (folio_test_swapbacked(folio) &&
+ folio_test_large(folio)) {
+ /* Split shmem folio */
if (split_folio_to_list(folio, page_list))
goto keep_locked;
}
/*
- * THP may get split above, need minus tail pages and update
- * nr_pages to avoid accounting tail pages twice.
- *
- * The tail pages that are added into swap cache successfully
- * reach here.
+ * If the folio was split above, the tail pages will make
+ * their own pass through this function and be accounted
+ * then.
*/
- if ((nr_pages > 1) && !PageTransHuge(page)) {
+ if ((nr_pages > 1) && !folio_test_large(folio)) {
sc->nr_scanned -= (nr_pages - 1);
nr_pages = 1;
}
@@ -1815,7 +1812,7 @@ retry:
if (references == PAGEREF_RECLAIM_CLEAN)
goto keep_locked;
- if (!may_enter_fs(page, sc->gfp_mask))
+ if (!may_enter_fs(folio, sc->gfp_mask))
goto keep_locked;
if (!sc->may_writepage)
goto keep_locked;
@@ -1917,11 +1914,11 @@ retry:
sc->target_mem_cgroup))
goto keep_locked;
- unlock_page(page);
+ folio_unlock(folio);
free_it:
/*
- * THP may get swapped out in a whole, need account
- * all base pages.
+ * Folio may get swapped out as a whole, need to account
+ * all pages in it.
*/
nr_reclaimed += nr_pages;
@@ -1929,10 +1926,10 @@ free_it:
* Is there need to periodically free_page_list? It would
* appear not as the counts should be low
*/
- if (unlikely(PageTransHuge(page)))
- destroy_compound_page(page);
+ if (unlikely(folio_test_large(folio)))
+ destroy_compound_page(&folio->page);
else
- list_add(&page->lru, &free_pages);
+ list_add(&folio->lru, &free_pages);
continue;
activate_locked_split:
@@ -1958,18 +1955,19 @@ activate_locked:
count_memcg_folio_events(folio, PGACTIVATE, nr_pages);
}
keep_locked:
- unlock_page(page);
+ folio_unlock(folio);
keep:
- list_add(&page->lru, &ret_pages);
- VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageLRU(page) || PageUnevictable(page), page);
+ list_add(&folio->lru, &ret_pages);
+ VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_lru(folio) ||
+ folio_test_unevictable(folio), folio);
}
/* 'page_list' is always empty here */
- /* Migrate pages selected for demotion */
+ /* Migrate folios selected for demotion */
nr_reclaimed += demote_page_list(&demote_pages, pgdat);
- /* Pages that could not be demoted are still in @demote_pages */
+ /* Folios that could not be demoted are still in @demote_pages */
if (!list_empty(&demote_pages)) {
- /* Pages which failed to demoted go back on @page_list for retry: */
+ /* Folios which weren't demoted go back on @page_list for retry: */
list_splice_init(&demote_pages, page_list);
do_demote_pass = false;
goto retry;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are
mm-add-vma-iterator.patch
mmap-use-the-vma-iterator-in-count_vma_pages_range.patch
proc-remove-vma-rbtree-use-from-nommu.patch
arm64-remove-mmap-linked-list-from-vdso.patch
parisc-remove-mmap-linked-list-from-cache-handling.patch
powerpc-remove-mmap-linked-list-walks.patch
s390-remove-vma-linked-list-walks.patch
x86-remove-vma-linked-list-walks.patch
xtensa-remove-vma-linked-list-walks.patch
cxl-remove-vma-linked-list-walk.patch
optee-remove-vma-linked-list-walk.patch
um-remove-vma-linked-list-walk.patch
coredump-remove-vma-linked-list-walk.patch
exec-use-vma-iterator-instead-of-linked-list.patch
fs-proc-task_mmu-stop-using-linked-list-and-highest_vm_end.patch
acct-use-vma-iterator-instead-of-linked-list.patch
perf-use-vma-iterator.patch
sched-use-maple-tree-iterator-to-walk-vmas.patch
fork-use-vma-iterator.patch
mm-khugepaged-stop-using-vma-linked-list.patch
mm-ksm-use-vma-iterators-instead-of-vma-linked-list.patch
mm-mlock-use-vma-iterator-and-maple-state-instead-of-vma-linked-list.patch
mm-pagewalk-use-vma_find-instead-of-vma-linked-list.patch
i915-use-the-vma-iterator.patch
nommu-remove-uses-of-vma-linked-list.patch
