The quilt patch titled
Subject: mmap locking API: fix missed mmap_sem references in comments
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mmap-locking-api-fix-missed-mmap_sem-references-in-comments.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mm-stable
------------------------------------------------------
From: Florian Rommel <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mmap locking API: fix missed mmap_sem references in comments
Commit c1e8d7c6a7a6 ("mmap locking API: convert mmap_sem comments") missed
replacing some references of mmap_sem by mmap_lock due to misspelling
(mm_sem instead of mmap_sem).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220503113333.214124-1-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Florian Rommel <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v7.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v8.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c | 2 +-
mm/mmap.c | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v7.c~mmap-locking-api-fix-missed-mmap_sem-references-in-comments
+++ a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v7.c
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static int kgd_hqd_load(struct amdgpu_de
/* read_user_ptr may take the mm->mmap_lock.
* release srbm_mutex to avoid circular dependency between
- * srbm_mutex->mm_sem->reservation_ww_class_mutex->srbm_mutex.
+ * srbm_mutex->mmap_lock->reservation_ww_class_mutex->srbm_mutex.
*/
release_queue(adev);
valid_wptr = read_user_wptr(mm, wptr, wptr_val);
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v8.c~mmap-locking-api-fix-missed-mmap_sem-references-in-comments
+++ a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v8.c
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static int kgd_hqd_load(struct amdgpu_de
/* read_user_ptr may take the mm->mmap_lock.
* release srbm_mutex to avoid circular dependency between
- * srbm_mutex->mm_sem->reservation_ww_class_mutex->srbm_mutex.
+ * srbm_mutex->mmap_lock->reservation_ww_class_mutex->srbm_mutex.
*/
release_queue(adev);
valid_wptr = read_user_wptr(mm, wptr, wptr_val);
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c~mmap-locking-api-fix-missed-mmap_sem-references-in-comments
+++ a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static unsigned long ttm_bo_io_mem_pfn(s
* @bo: The buffer object
* @vmf: The fault structure handed to the callback
*
- * vm callbacks like fault() and *_mkwrite() allow for the mm_sem to be dropped
+ * vm callbacks like fault() and *_mkwrite() allow for the mmap_lock to be dropped
* during long waits, and after the wait the callback will be restarted. This
* is to allow other threads using the same virtual memory space concurrent
* access to map(), unmap() completely unrelated buffer objects. TTM buffer
--- a/mm/mmap.c~mmap-locking-api-fix-missed-mmap_sem-references-in-comments
+++ a/mm/mmap.c
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ static int anon_vma_compatible(struct vm
* the same as 'old', the other will be the new one that is trying
* to share the anon_vma.
*
- * NOTE! This runs with mm_sem held for reading, so it is possible that
+ * NOTE! This runs with mmap_lock held for reading, so it is possible that
* the anon_vma of 'old' is concurrently in the process of being set up
* by another page fault trying to merge _that_. But that's ok: if it
* is being set up, that automatically means that it will be a singleton
@@ -1299,7 +1299,7 @@ static int anon_vma_compatible(struct vm
*
* We also make sure that the two vma's are compatible (adjacent,
* and with the same memory policies). That's all stable, even with just
- * a read lock on the mm_sem.
+ * a read lock on the mmap_lock.
*/
static struct anon_vma *reusable_anon_vma(struct vm_area_struct *old, struct vm_area_struct *a, struct vm_area_struct *b)
{
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx are
