Re: [patch 02/14] tmpfs: fix regressions from wider use of ZERO_PAGE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 9:50 AM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> where that "read(..) = 16" is the important part. It correctly figured
> out that it can only do 16 bytes (ok, 17, but we've always allowed the
> user accessor functions to block).

Bad choice of words - by "block" I meant "doing the accesses in
blocks", in this case 64-bit words.

Obviously the user accessors _also_ "block" in the sense of having to
wait for page faults and IO.

I think 'copy_{to,from}_user()' actually does go to the effort to try
to do byte-exact results, though.

In particular, see copy_user_handle_tail in arch/x86/lib/copy_user_64.S.

But I think that we long ago ended up deciding it really wasn't worth
doing it, and x86 ends up just going to unnecessary lengths for this
case.

               Linus



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux