The patch titled
Subject: kasan, page_alloc: deduplicate should_skip_kasan_poison
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
kasan-page_alloc-deduplicate-should_skip_kasan_poison.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: kasan, page_alloc: deduplicate should_skip_kasan_poison
Patch series "kasan, vmalloc, arm64: add vmalloc tagging support for SW/HW_TAGS", v6.
This patchset adds vmalloc tagging support for SW_TAGS and HW_TAGS
KASAN modes.
About half of patches are cleanups I went for along the way. None of them
seem to be important enough to go through stable, so I decided not to
split them out into separate patches/series.
The patchset is partially based on an early version of the HW_TAGS
patchset by Vincenzo that had vmalloc support. Thus, I added a
Co-developed-by tag into a few patches.
SW_TAGS vmalloc tagging support is straightforward. It reuses all of the
generic KASAN machinery, but uses shadow memory to store tags instead of
magic values. Naturally, vmalloc tagging requires adding a few
kasan_reset_tag() annotations to the vmalloc code.
HW_TAGS vmalloc tagging support stands out. HW_TAGS KASAN is based on Arm
MTE, which can only assigns tags to physical memory. As a result, HW_TAGS
KASAN only tags vmalloc() allocations, which are backed by page_alloc
memory. It ignores vmap() and others.
This patch (of 39):
Currently, should_skip_kasan_poison() has two definitions: one for when
CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT is enabled, one for when it's not.
Instead of duplicating the checks, add a deferred_pages_enabled() helper
and use it in a single should_skip_kasan_poison() definition.
Also move should_skip_kasan_poison() closer to its caller and clarify all
conditions in the comment.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1643047180.git.andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/658b79f5fb305edaf7dc16bc52ea870d3220d4a8.1643047180.git.andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~kasan-page_alloc-deduplicate-should_skip_kasan_poison
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -378,25 +378,9 @@ int page_group_by_mobility_disabled __re
*/
static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(deferred_pages);
-/*
- * Calling kasan_poison_pages() only after deferred memory initialization
- * has completed. Poisoning pages during deferred memory init will greatly
- * lengthen the process and cause problem in large memory systems as the
- * deferred pages initialization is done with interrupt disabled.
- *
- * Assuming that there will be no reference to those newly initialized
- * pages before they are ever allocated, this should have no effect on
- * KASAN memory tracking as the poison will be properly inserted at page
- * allocation time. The only corner case is when pages are allocated by
- * on-demand allocation and then freed again before the deferred pages
- * initialization is done, but this is not likely to happen.
- */
-static inline bool should_skip_kasan_poison(struct page *page, fpi_t fpi_flags)
+static inline bool deferred_pages_enabled(void)
{
- return static_branch_unlikely(&deferred_pages) ||
- (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC) &&
- (fpi_flags & FPI_SKIP_KASAN_POISON)) ||
- PageSkipKASanPoison(page);
+ return static_branch_unlikely(&deferred_pages);
}
/* Returns true if the struct page for the pfn is uninitialised */
@@ -447,11 +431,9 @@ defer_init(int nid, unsigned long pfn, u
return false;
}
#else
-static inline bool should_skip_kasan_poison(struct page *page, fpi_t fpi_flags)
+static inline bool deferred_pages_enabled(void)
{
- return (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC) &&
- (fpi_flags & FPI_SKIP_KASAN_POISON)) ||
- PageSkipKASanPoison(page);
+ return false;
}
static inline bool early_page_uninitialised(unsigned long pfn)
@@ -1267,6 +1249,35 @@ out:
return ret;
}
+/*
+ * Skip KASAN memory poisoning when either:
+ *
+ * 1. Deferred memory initialization has not yet completed,
+ * see the explanation below.
+ * 2. Skipping poisoning is requested via FPI_SKIP_KASAN_POISON,
+ * see the comment next to it.
+ * 3. Skipping poisoning is requested via __GFP_SKIP_KASAN_POISON,
+ * see the comment next to it.
+ *
+ * Poisoning pages during deferred memory init will greatly lengthen the
+ * process and cause problem in large memory systems as the deferred pages
+ * initialization is done with interrupt disabled.
+ *
+ * Assuming that there will be no reference to those newly initialized
+ * pages before they are ever allocated, this should have no effect on
+ * KASAN memory tracking as the poison will be properly inserted at page
+ * allocation time. The only corner case is when pages are allocated by
+ * on-demand allocation and then freed again before the deferred pages
+ * initialization is done, but this is not likely to happen.
+ */
+static inline bool should_skip_kasan_poison(struct page *page, fpi_t fpi_flags)
+{
+ return deferred_pages_enabled() ||
+ (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC) &&
+ (fpi_flags & FPI_SKIP_KASAN_POISON)) ||
+ PageSkipKASanPoison(page);
+}
+
static void kernel_init_free_pages(struct page *page, int numpages, bool zero_tags)
{
int i;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx are
stacktrace-add-interface-based-on-shadow-call-stack.patch
arm64-scs-save-scs_sp-values-per-cpu-when-switching-stacks.patch
arm64-implement-stack_trace_save_shadow.patch
kasan-use-stack_trace_save_shadow.patch
