The patch titled
Subject: bitfield: add explicit inclusions to the example
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
bitfield-add-explicit-inclusions-to-the-example.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: bitfield: add explicit inclusions to the example
It's not obvious that bitfield.h doesn't guarantee the bits.h inclusion
and the example in the former is confusing. Some developers think that
it's okay to just include bitfield.h to get it working. Change example to
explicitly include necessary headers in order to avoid confusion.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220207123341.47533-1-andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 3e9b3112ec74 ("add basic register-field manipulation macros")
Depends-on: 8bd9cb51daac ("locking/atomics, asm-generic: Move some macros from <linux/bitops.h> to a new <linux/bits.h> file")
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Jan DÄ?broÅ? <jsd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/bitfield.h | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- a/include/linux/bitfield.h~bitfield-add-explicit-inclusions-to-the-example
+++ a/include/linux/bitfield.h
@@ -19,6 +19,9 @@
*
* Example:
*
+ * #include <linux/bitfield.h>
+ * #include <linux/bits.h>
+ *
* #define REG_FIELD_A GENMASK(6, 0)
* #define REG_FIELD_B BIT(7)
* #define REG_FIELD_C GENMASK(15, 8)
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
