The patch titled Subject: ocfs2: cleanup some return variables has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was ocfs2-cleanup-some-return-variables.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree ------------------------------------------------------ From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: ocfs2: cleanup some return variables Simply return directly instead of assign the return value to another variable. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220114021641.13927-1-joseph.qi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: CGEL ZTE <cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@xxxxxxx> Cc: Gang He <ghe@xxxxxxxx> Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/ocfs2/file.c | 9 +++------ fs/ocfs2/stack_user.c | 18 ++++++------------ 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) --- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c~ocfs2-cleanup-some-return-variables +++ a/fs/ocfs2/file.c @@ -540,15 +540,12 @@ int ocfs2_add_inode_data(struct ocfs2_su struct ocfs2_alloc_context *meta_ac, enum ocfs2_alloc_restarted *reason_ret) { - int ret; struct ocfs2_extent_tree et; ocfs2_init_dinode_extent_tree(&et, INODE_CACHE(inode), fe_bh); - ret = ocfs2_add_clusters_in_btree(handle, &et, logical_offset, - clusters_to_add, mark_unwritten, - data_ac, meta_ac, reason_ret); - - return ret; + return ocfs2_add_clusters_in_btree(handle, &et, logical_offset, + clusters_to_add, mark_unwritten, + data_ac, meta_ac, reason_ret); } static int ocfs2_extend_allocation(struct inode *inode, u32 logical_start, --- a/fs/ocfs2/stack_user.c~ocfs2-cleanup-some-return-variables +++ a/fs/ocfs2/stack_user.c @@ -683,28 +683,22 @@ static int user_dlm_lock(struct ocfs2_cl void *name, unsigned int namelen) { - int ret; - if (!lksb->lksb_fsdlm.sb_lvbptr) lksb->lksb_fsdlm.sb_lvbptr = (char *)lksb + sizeof(struct dlm_lksb); - ret = dlm_lock(conn->cc_lockspace, mode, &lksb->lksb_fsdlm, - flags|DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT, name, namelen, 0, - fsdlm_lock_ast_wrapper, lksb, - fsdlm_blocking_ast_wrapper); - return ret; + return dlm_lock(conn->cc_lockspace, mode, &lksb->lksb_fsdlm, + flags|DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT, name, namelen, 0, + fsdlm_lock_ast_wrapper, lksb, + fsdlm_blocking_ast_wrapper); } static int user_dlm_unlock(struct ocfs2_cluster_connection *conn, struct ocfs2_dlm_lksb *lksb, u32 flags) { - int ret; - - ret = dlm_unlock(conn->cc_lockspace, lksb->lksb_fsdlm.sb_lkid, - flags, &lksb->lksb_fsdlm, lksb); - return ret; + return dlm_unlock(conn->cc_lockspace, lksb->lksb_fsdlm.sb_lkid, + flags, &lksb->lksb_fsdlm, lksb); } static int user_dlm_lock_status(struct ocfs2_dlm_lksb *lksb) _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from joseph.qi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are