[patch 032/227] memcg: replace in_interrupt() with !in_task()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: memcg: replace in_interrupt() with !in_task()

Replace the deprecated in_interrupt() with !in_task() because
in_interrupt() returns true for BH disabled even if the call happens in
the task context.  in_task() is the right interface to differentiate task
context from NMI, hard IRQ and softirq contexts.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220127162636.3461256-1-shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vasily Averin <vvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/memcontrol.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-replace-in_interrupt-with-in_task
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2688,7 +2688,7 @@ done_restock:
 			READ_ONCE(memcg->swap.high);
 
 		/* Don't bother a random interrupted task */
-		if (in_interrupt()) {
+		if (!in_task()) {
 			if (mem_high) {
 				schedule_work(&memcg->high_work);
 				break;
@@ -6968,7 +6968,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk
 		return;
 
 	/* Do not associate the sock with unrelated interrupted task's memcg. */
-	if (in_interrupt())
+	if (!in_task())
 		return;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
_



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux