From: Bang Li <libang.linuxer@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: mm/swap: fix confusing comment in folio_mark_accessed For unevictable pages, we don't need mark them. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220311141519.59948-1-libang.linuxer@xxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Bang Li <libang.linuxer@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- mm/swap.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/mm/swap.c~mm-swap-fix-confusing-comment-in-folio_mark_accessed +++ a/mm/swap.c @@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ void folio_mark_accessed(struct folio *f /* * Unevictable pages are on the "LRU_UNEVICTABLE" list. But, * this list is never rotated or maintained, so marking an - * evictable page accessed has no effect. + * unevictable page accessed has no effect. */ } else if (!folio_test_active(folio)) { /* _
