The patch titled Subject: hugetlb: fix comments about avoiding atomic allocation of vmemmap pages has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is hugetlb-fix-comments-about-avoiding-atomic-allocation-of-vmemmap-pages.patch This patch should soon appear at https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/hugetlb-fix-comments-about-avoiding-atomic-allocation-of-vmemmap-pages.patch and later at https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/hugetlb-fix-comments-about-avoiding-atomic-allocation-of-vmemmap-pages.patch Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's *** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code *** The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated there every 3-4 working days ------------------------------------------------------ From: luofei <luofei@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: hugetlb: fix comments about avoiding atomic allocation of vmemmap pages Since there is no longer an atomic allocation of vmemmap pages, but a fixed flag(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_THISNODE) is used. The description of atomicity here is some what inappropriate. And the atomic parameter naming of update_and_free_page() may be misleading, add a comment here. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220316031602.377452-1-luofei@xxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: luofei <luofei@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- mm/hugetlb.c | 17 ++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- a/mm/hugetlb.c~hugetlb-fix-comments-about-avoiding-atomic-allocation-of-vmemmap-pages +++ a/mm/hugetlb.c @@ -1567,10 +1567,12 @@ static void __update_and_free_page(struc } /* - * As update_and_free_page() can be called under any context, so we cannot - * use GFP_KERNEL to allocate vmemmap pages. However, we can defer the - * actual freeing in a workqueue to prevent from using GFP_ATOMIC to allocate - * the vmemmap pages. + * Freeing hugetlb pages in done in update_and_free_page(). When freeing + * a hugetlb page, vmemmap pages may need to be allocated. The routine + * alloc_huge_page_vmemmap() can possibly sleep as it uses GFP_KERNEL. + * However, update_and_free_page() can be called under any context. To + * avoid the possibility of sleeping in a context where sleeping is not + * allowed, defer the actual freeing in a workqueue where sleeping is allowed. * * free_hpage_workfn() locklessly retrieves the linked list of pages to be * freed and frees them one-by-one. As the page->mapping pointer is going @@ -1614,6 +1616,10 @@ static inline void flush_free_hpage_work flush_work(&free_hpage_work); } +/* + * atomic == true indicates called from a context where sleeping is + * not allowed. + */ static void update_and_free_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page, bool atomic) { @@ -1623,7 +1629,8 @@ static void update_and_free_page(struct } /* - * Defer freeing to avoid using GFP_ATOMIC to allocate vmemmap pages. + * Defer freeing to avoid possible sleeping when allocating + * vmemmap pages. * * Only call schedule_work() if hpage_freelist is previously * empty. Otherwise, schedule_work() had been called but the workfn _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from luofei@xxxxxxxxxxxx are mm-hwpoison-avoid-the-impact-of-hwpoison_filter-return-value-on-mce-handler.patch mm-hwpoison-add-in-use-hugepage-hwpoison-filter-judgement.patch hugetlb-fix-comments-about-avoiding-atomic-allocation-of-vmemmap-pages.patch