[patch 04/12] hugetlbfs: fix a truncation issue in hugepages parameter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Liu Yuntao <liuyuntao10@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: hugetlbfs: fix a truncation issue in hugepages parameter

When we specify a large number for node in hugepages parameter, it may be
parsed to another number due to truncation in this statement:

	node = tmp;

For example, add following parameter in command line:

	hugepagesz=1G hugepages=4294967297:5

and kernel will allocate 5 hugepages for node 1 instead of ignoring it.

I move the validation check earlier to fix this issue, and slightly
simplifies the condition here.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220209134018.8242-1-liuyuntao10@xxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: b5389086ad7be0 ("hugetlbfs: extend the definition of hugepages parameter to support node allocation")
Signed-off-by: Liu Yuntao <liuyuntao10@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/hugetlb.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/hugetlb.c~hugetlbfs-fix-a-truncation-issue-in-hugepages-parameter
+++ a/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -4159,10 +4159,10 @@ static int __init hugepages_setup(char *
 				pr_warn("HugeTLB: architecture can't support node specific alloc, ignoring!\n");
 				return 0;
 			}
+			if (tmp >= nr_online_nodes)
+				goto invalid;
 			node = tmp;
 			p += count + 1;
-			if (node < 0 || node >= nr_online_nodes)
-				goto invalid;
 			/* Parse hugepages */
 			if (sscanf(p, "%lu%n", &tmp, &count) != 1)
 				goto invalid;
_



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux