The patch titled Subject: test_hash.c: split test_int_hash into arch-specific functions has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was test_hashc-split-test_int_hash-into-arch-specific-functions.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree ------------------------------------------------------ From: Isabella Basso <isabbasso@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: test_hash.c: split test_int_hash into arch-specific functions Split the test_int_hash function to keep its mainloop separate from arch-specific chunks, which are only compiled as needed. This aims at improving readability. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211208183711.390454-3-isabbasso@xxxxxxxxxx Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Isabella Basso <isabbasso@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Augusto Durães Camargo <augusto.duraes33@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Enzo Ferreira <ferreiraenzoa@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- lib/test_hash.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) --- a/lib/test_hash.c~test_hashc-split-test_int_hash-into-arch-specific-functions +++ a/lib/test_hash.c @@ -56,6 +56,58 @@ fill_buf(char *buf, size_t len, u32 seed } } +/* Holds most testing variables for the int test. */ +struct test_hash_params { + /* Pointer to integer to be hashed. */ + unsigned long long *h64; + /* Low 32-bits of integer to be hashed. */ + u32 h0; + /* Arch-specific hash result. */ + u32 h1; + /* Generic hash result. */ + u32 h2; + /* ORed hashes of given size (in bits). */ + u32 (*hash_or)[33]; +}; + +#ifdef HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 +static bool __init +test_int__hash_32(struct test_hash_params *params) +{ + params->hash_or[1][0] |= params->h2 = __hash_32_generic(params->h0); +#if HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 == 1 + if (params->h1 != params->h2) { + pr_err("__hash_32(%#x) = %#x != __hash_32_generic() = %#x", + params->h0, params->h1, params->h2); + return false; + } +#endif + return true; +} +#endif + +#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 +static bool __init +test_int_hash_64(struct test_hash_params *params, u32 const *m, int *k) +{ + params->h2 = hash_64_generic(*params->h64, *k); +#if HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 == 1 + if (params->h1 != params->h2) { + pr_err("hash_64(%#llx, %d) = %#x != hash_64_generic() = %#x", + *params->h64, *k, params->h1, params->h2); + return false; + } +#else + if (params->h2 > *m) { + pr_err("hash_64_generic(%#llx, %d) = %#x > %#x", + *params->h64, *k, params->h1, *m); + return false; + } +#endif + return true; +} +#endif + /* * Test the various integer hash functions. h64 (or its low-order bits) * is the integer to hash. hash_or accumulates the OR of the hash values, @@ -69,19 +121,13 @@ static bool __init test_int_hash(unsigned long long h64, u32 hash_or[2][33]) { int k; - u32 h0 = (u32)h64, h1, h2; + struct test_hash_params params = { &h64, (u32)h64, 0, 0, hash_or }; /* Test __hash32 */ - hash_or[0][0] |= h1 = __hash_32(h0); + hash_or[0][0] |= params.h1 = __hash_32(params.h0); #ifdef HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 - hash_or[1][0] |= h2 = __hash_32_generic(h0); -#if HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 == 1 - if (h1 != h2) { - pr_err("__hash_32(%#x) = %#x != __hash_32_generic() = %#x", - h0, h1, h2); + if (!test_int__hash_32(¶ms)) return false; - } -#endif #endif /* Test k = 1..32 bits */ @@ -89,37 +135,24 @@ test_int_hash(unsigned long long h64, u3 u32 const m = ((u32)2 << (k-1)) - 1; /* Low k bits set */ /* Test hash_32 */ - hash_or[0][k] |= h1 = hash_32(h0, k); - if (h1 > m) { - pr_err("hash_32(%#x, %d) = %#x > %#x", h0, k, h1, m); + hash_or[0][k] |= params.h1 = hash_32(params.h0, k); + if (params.h1 > m) { + pr_err("hash_32(%#x, %d) = %#x > %#x", params.h0, k, params.h1, m); return false; } /* Test hash_64 */ - hash_or[1][k] |= h1 = hash_64(h64, k); - if (h1 > m) { - pr_err("hash_64(%#llx, %d) = %#x > %#x", h64, k, h1, m); + hash_or[1][k] |= params.h1 = hash_64(h64, k); + if (params.h1 > m) { + pr_err("hash_64(%#llx, %d) = %#x > %#x", h64, k, params.h1, m); return false; } #ifdef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 - h2 = hash_64_generic(h64, k); -#if HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 == 1 - if (h1 != h2) { - pr_err("hash_64(%#llx, %d) = %#x != hash_64_generic() " - "= %#x", h64, k, h1, h2); + if (!test_int_hash_64(¶ms, &m, &k)) return false; - } -#else - if (h2 > m) { - pr_err("hash_64_generic(%#llx, %d) = %#x > %#x", - h64, k, h1, m); - return false; - } -#endif #endif } - (void)h2; /* Suppress unused variable warning */ return true; } _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from isabbasso@xxxxxxxxxx are