The patch titled
Subject: mm: emit the "free" trace report before freeing memory in kmem_cache_free()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-emit-the-free-trace-report-before-freeing-memory-in-kmem_cache_free.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm: emit the "free" trace report before freeing memory in kmem_cache_free()
After the memory is freed, it can be immediately allocated by other CPUs,
before the "free" trace report has been emitted. This causes inaccurate
traces.
For example, if the following sequence of events occurs:
CPU 0 CPU 1
(1) alloc xxxxxx
(2) free xxxxxx
(3) alloc xxxxxx
(4) free xxxxxx
Then they will be inaccurately reported via tracing, so that they appear
to have happened in this order:
CPU 0 CPU 1
(1) alloc xxxxxx
(2) alloc xxxxxx
(3) free xxxxxx
(4) free xxxxxx
This makes it look like CPU 1 somehow managed to allocate memory that CPU
0 still had allocated for itself.
In order to avoid this, emit the "free xxxxxx" tracing report just before
the actual call to free the memory, instead of just after it.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/374eb75d-7404-8721-4e1e-65b0e5b17279@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/slab.c | 3 +--
mm/slob.c | 3 +--
mm/slub.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/slab.c~mm-emit-the-free-trace-report-before-freeing-memory-in-kmem_cache_free
+++ a/mm/slab.c
@@ -3733,14 +3733,13 @@ void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *
if (!cachep)
return;
+ trace_kmem_cache_free(_RET_IP_, objp, cachep->name);
local_irq_save(flags);
debug_check_no_locks_freed(objp, cachep->object_size);
if (!(cachep->flags & SLAB_DEBUG_OBJECTS))
debug_check_no_obj_freed(objp, cachep->object_size);
__cache_free(cachep, objp, _RET_IP_);
local_irq_restore(flags);
-
- trace_kmem_cache_free(_RET_IP_, objp, cachep->name);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_free);
--- a/mm/slob.c~mm-emit-the-free-trace-report-before-freeing-memory-in-kmem_cache_free
+++ a/mm/slob.c
@@ -666,6 +666,7 @@ static void kmem_rcu_free(struct rcu_hea
void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *c, void *b)
{
kmemleak_free_recursive(b, c->flags);
+ trace_kmem_cache_free(_RET_IP_, b, c->name);
if (unlikely(c->flags & SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU)) {
struct slob_rcu *slob_rcu;
slob_rcu = b + (c->size - sizeof(struct slob_rcu));
@@ -674,8 +675,6 @@ void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *
} else {
__kmem_cache_free(b, c->size);
}
-
- trace_kmem_cache_free(_RET_IP_, b, c->name);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_free);
--- a/mm/slub.c~mm-emit-the-free-trace-report-before-freeing-memory-in-kmem_cache_free
+++ a/mm/slub.c
@@ -3526,8 +3526,8 @@ void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *
s = cache_from_obj(s, x);
if (!s)
return;
- slab_free(s, virt_to_head_page(x), x, NULL, 1, _RET_IP_);
trace_kmem_cache_free(_RET_IP_, x, s->name);
+ slab_free(s, virt_to_head_page(x), x, NULL, 1, _RET_IP_);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_free);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from yeyunfeng@xxxxxxxxxx are
