[patch 61/87] coda: avoid hidden code duplication in rename

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Jan Harkes <jaharkes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: coda: avoid hidden code duplication in rename

We were actually fixing up the directory mtime in both branches after the
negative dentry test, it was just that one branch was only flagging the
directory inodes to refresh their attributes while the other branch used
the optional optimization to set mtime to the current time and not go back
to the Coda client.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210908140308.18491-6-jaharkes@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jan Harkes <jaharkes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jing Yangyang <jing.yangyang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Xin Tan <tanxin.ctf@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Xiyu Yang <xiyuyang19@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 fs/coda/dir.c |    7 ++-----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/coda/dir.c~coda-avoid-hidden-code-duplication-in-rename
+++ a/fs/coda/dir.c
@@ -317,13 +317,10 @@ static int coda_rename(struct user_names
 				coda_dir_drop_nlink(old_dir);
 				coda_dir_inc_nlink(new_dir);
 			}
-			coda_dir_update_mtime(old_dir);
-			coda_dir_update_mtime(new_dir);
 			coda_flag_inode(d_inode(new_dentry), C_VATTR);
-		} else {
-			coda_flag_inode(old_dir, C_VATTR);
-			coda_flag_inode(new_dir, C_VATTR);
 		}
+		coda_dir_update_mtime(old_dir);
+		coda_dir_update_mtime(new_dir);
 	}
 	return error;
 }
_



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux