From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: mm: list_lru: only add memcg-aware lrus to the global lru list The non-memcg-aware lru is always skiped when traversing the global lru list, which is not efficient. We can only add the memcg-aware lru to the global lru list instead to make traversing more efficient. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211025124353.55781-1-songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- mm/list_lru.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) --- a/mm/list_lru.c~mm-list_lru-only-add-memcg-aware-lrus-to-the-global-lru-list +++ a/mm/list_lru.c @@ -15,18 +15,29 @@ #include "slab.h" #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM -static LIST_HEAD(list_lrus); +static LIST_HEAD(memcg_list_lrus); static DEFINE_MUTEX(list_lrus_mutex); +static inline bool list_lru_memcg_aware(struct list_lru *lru) +{ + return lru->memcg_aware; +} + static void list_lru_register(struct list_lru *lru) { + if (!list_lru_memcg_aware(lru)) + return; + mutex_lock(&list_lrus_mutex); - list_add(&lru->list, &list_lrus); + list_add(&lru->list, &memcg_list_lrus); mutex_unlock(&list_lrus_mutex); } static void list_lru_unregister(struct list_lru *lru) { + if (!list_lru_memcg_aware(lru)) + return; + mutex_lock(&list_lrus_mutex); list_del(&lru->list); mutex_unlock(&list_lrus_mutex); @@ -37,11 +48,6 @@ static int lru_shrinker_id(struct list_l return lru->shrinker_id; } -static inline bool list_lru_memcg_aware(struct list_lru *lru) -{ - return lru->memcg_aware; -} - static inline struct list_lru_one * list_lru_from_memcg_idx(struct list_lru_node *nlru, int idx) { @@ -457,9 +463,6 @@ static int memcg_update_list_lru(struct { int i; - if (!list_lru_memcg_aware(lru)) - return 0; - for_each_node(i) { if (memcg_update_list_lru_node(&lru->node[i], old_size, new_size)) @@ -482,9 +485,6 @@ static void memcg_cancel_update_list_lru { int i; - if (!list_lru_memcg_aware(lru)) - return; - for_each_node(i) memcg_cancel_update_list_lru_node(&lru->node[i], old_size, new_size); @@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ int memcg_update_all_list_lrus(int new_s int old_size = memcg_nr_cache_ids; mutex_lock(&list_lrus_mutex); - list_for_each_entry(lru, &list_lrus, list) { + list_for_each_entry(lru, &memcg_list_lrus, list) { ret = memcg_update_list_lru(lru, old_size, new_size); if (ret) goto fail; @@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ out: mutex_unlock(&list_lrus_mutex); return ret; fail: - list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(lru, &list_lrus, list) + list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(lru, &memcg_list_lrus, list) memcg_cancel_update_list_lru(lru, old_size, new_size); goto out; } @@ -543,9 +543,6 @@ static void memcg_drain_list_lru(struct { int i; - if (!list_lru_memcg_aware(lru)) - return; - for_each_node(i) memcg_drain_list_lru_node(lru, i, src_idx, dst_memcg); } @@ -555,7 +552,7 @@ void memcg_drain_all_list_lrus(int src_i struct list_lru *lru; mutex_lock(&list_lrus_mutex); - list_for_each_entry(lru, &list_lrus, list) + list_for_each_entry(lru, &memcg_list_lrus, list) memcg_drain_list_lru(lru, src_idx, dst_memcg); mutex_unlock(&list_lrus_mutex); } _
