The patch titled Subject: mm/list_lru.c: prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is mm-list_lruc-prefer-struct_size-over-open-coded-arithmetic.patch This patch should soon appear at https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-list_lruc-prefer-struct_size-over-open-coded-arithmetic.patch and later at https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-list_lruc-prefer-struct_size-over-open-coded-arithmetic.patch Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's *** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code *** The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated there every 3-4 working days ------------------------------------------------------ From: Len Baker <len.baker@xxxxxxx> Subject: mm/list_lru.c: prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic As noted in the "Deprecated Interfaces, Language Features, Attributes, and Conventions" documentation [1], size calculations (especially multiplication) should not be performed in memory allocator (or similar) function arguments due to the risk of them overflowing. This could lead to values wrapping around and a smaller allocation being made than the caller was expecting. Using those allocations could lead to linear overflows of heap memory and other misbehaviors. So, use the struct_size() helper to do the arithmetic instead of the argument "size + count * size" in the kvmalloc() functions. Also, take the opportunity to refactor the memcpy() call to use the flex_array_size() helper. This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle and audited and fixed manually. [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#open-co= ded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211017105929.9284-1-len.baker@xxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Len Baker <len.baker@xxxxxxx> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- mm/list_lru.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/mm/list_lru.c~mm-list_lruc-prefer-struct_size-over-open-coded-arithmetic +++ a/mm/list_lru.c @@ -354,8 +354,7 @@ static int memcg_init_list_lru_node(stru struct list_lru_memcg *memcg_lrus; int size = memcg_nr_cache_ids; - memcg_lrus = kvmalloc(sizeof(*memcg_lrus) + - size * sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL); + memcg_lrus = kvmalloc(struct_size(memcg_lrus, lru, size), GFP_KERNEL); if (!memcg_lrus) return -ENOMEM; @@ -389,7 +388,7 @@ static int memcg_update_list_lru_node(st old = rcu_dereference_protected(nlru->memcg_lrus, lockdep_is_held(&list_lrus_mutex)); - new = kvmalloc(sizeof(*new) + new_size * sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL); + new = kvmalloc(struct_size(new, lru, new_size), GFP_KERNEL); if (!new) return -ENOMEM; @@ -398,7 +397,7 @@ static int memcg_update_list_lru_node(st return -ENOMEM; } - memcpy(&new->lru, &old->lru, old_size * sizeof(void *)); + memcpy(&new->lru, &old->lru, flex_array_size(new, lru, old_size)); /* * The locking below allows readers that hold nlru->lock avoid taking _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from len.baker@xxxxxxx are mm-list_lruc-prefer-struct_size-over-open-coded-arithmetic.patch