Re: + procfs-do-not-list-tid-0-in-proc-pid-task.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: + procfs-do-not-list-tid-0-in-proc-pid-task.patch added to -mm tree
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 21:28:26 +0300
Cc: christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx, ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx, fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx, keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx, mm-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20210929232038.o0_ct-q8J%akpm@linux-foundation.org>
References: <20210929232038.o0_ct-q8J%akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reply-to: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 04:20:38PM -0700, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Subject: procfs: do not list TID 0 in /proc/<pid>/task
> 
> If a task exits concurrently, task_pid_nr_ns may return 0.

So easy to reproduce, wonder why didn't anyone report it earlier.

Reviewed-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>

References:
- + procfs-do-not-list-tid-0-in-proc-pid-task.patch added to -mm tree
  - From: akpm

Prev by Date: + linux-next-rejects.patch added to -mm tree
Next by Date: + proc-test-that-proc-task-doesnt-contain-0.patch added to -mm tree
Previous by thread: + procfs-do-not-list-tid-0-in-proc-pid-task.patch added to -mm tree
Next by thread: + procfs-do-not-list-tid-0-in-proc-pid-task-fix.patch added to -mm tree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Archive] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux