Re: [patch 108/147] bitops: move find_bit_*_le functions from le.h to find.h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 12:38:27 -0700 Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 11:37:54AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 7:59 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Subject: bitops: move find_bit_*_le functions from le.h to find.h
> > >
> > > It's convenient to have all find_bit declarations in one place.
> > 
> > What what what?
> > 
> > The subject line says "move".
> > 
> > The body of the commit message doesn't imply anything else.
> > 
> > But the patch doesn't "move" anything at all:
> > 
> > >  include/asm-generic/bitops/find.h |  193 ----------------------------
> > >  include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h   |   64 ---------
> > >  2 files changed, 257 deletions(-)
> > 
> > What's going on?
> > 
> > Dropped just because I refuse to have anything to do with patches that
> > lie about what they are actually doing.
> 
> This is how the patch looks in my tree:
> https://github.com/norov/linux/commit/4a92b733138e3fd71cd8a021ad53cbce68d61cfc
> 
> And in my submission:
> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/2108.1/07330.html
> 
> So it actually does what it says. The following patch in this series
> also differs from what I have in my tree. Something weird happened...

There were some competing changes in next for a while so I guess there
was damage.

> Andrew, Linus, are you OK if I resend the patchset?

Linus suggests other changes.  I suggest you get this tree into -next
as discussed and put the changes through another kernel cycle.




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux