The patch titled
Subject: memcg: replace in_interrupt() by !in_task() in active_memcg()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
memcg-replace-in_interrupt-by-in_task-in-active_memcg.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Vasily Averin <vvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: memcg: replace in_interrupt() by !in_task() in active_memcg()
set_active_memcg() uses in_interrupt() check to select proper storage for
cgroup: pointer on task struct or per-cpu pointer.
It isn't fully correct: obsoleted in_interrupt() includes tasks with
disabled BH. It's better to use '!in_task()' instead.
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/7/26/487
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/ed4448b0-4970-616f-7368-ef9dd3cb628d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 37d5985c003d ("mm: kmem: prepare remote memcg charging infra for interrupt contexts")
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/sched/mm.h | 2 +-
mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/sched/mm.h~memcg-replace-in_interrupt-by-in_task-in-active_memcg
+++ a/include/linux/sched/mm.h
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ set_active_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memc
{
struct mem_cgroup *old;
- if (in_interrupt()) {
+ if (!in_task()) {
old = this_cpu_read(int_active_memcg);
this_cpu_write(int_active_memcg, memcg);
} else {
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-replace-in_interrupt-by-in_task-in-active_memcg
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -878,7 +878,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mem_cgroup_from_task);
static __always_inline struct mem_cgroup *active_memcg(void)
{
- if (in_interrupt())
+ if (!in_task())
return this_cpu_read(int_active_memcg);
else
return current->active_memcg;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from vvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are
