The patch titled
Subject: writeback: reliably update bandwidth estimation
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
writeback-reliably-update-bandwidth-estimation.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Subject: writeback: reliably update bandwidth estimation
Currently we trigger writeback bandwidth estimation from
balance_dirty_pages() and from wb_writeback(). However neither of these
need to trigger when the system is relatively idle and writeback is
triggered e.g. from fsync(2). Make sure writeback estimates happen
reliably by triggering them from do_writepages().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210713104716.22868-2-jack@xxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Michael Stapelberg <stapelberg+linux@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 3 --
include/linux/backing-dev.h | 19 ++++++++++++++++
include/linux/writeback.h | 1
mm/page-writeback.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
4 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c~writeback-reliably-update-bandwidth-estimation
+++ a/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -2004,7 +2004,6 @@ static long writeback_inodes_wb(struct b
static long wb_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
struct wb_writeback_work *work)
{
- unsigned long wb_start = jiffies;
long nr_pages = work->nr_pages;
unsigned long dirtied_before = jiffies;
struct inode *inode;
@@ -2058,8 +2057,6 @@ static long wb_writeback(struct bdi_writ
progress = __writeback_inodes_wb(wb, work);
trace_writeback_written(wb, work);
- wb_update_bandwidth(wb, wb_start);
-
/*
* Did we write something? Try for more
*
--- a/include/linux/backing-dev.h~writeback-reliably-update-bandwidth-estimation
+++ a/include/linux/backing-dev.h
@@ -288,6 +288,17 @@ static inline struct bdi_writeback *inod
return inode->i_wb;
}
+static inline struct bdi_writeback *inode_to_wb_wbc(
+ struct inode *inode,
+ struct writeback_control *wbc)
+{
+ /*
+ * If wbc does not have inode attached, it means cgroup writeback was
+ * disabled when wbc started. Just use the default wb in that case.
+ */
+ return wbc->wb ? wbc->wb : &inode_to_bdi(inode)->wb;
+}
+
/**
* unlocked_inode_to_wb_begin - begin unlocked inode wb access transaction
* @inode: target inode
@@ -366,6 +377,14 @@ static inline struct bdi_writeback *inod
return &inode_to_bdi(inode)->wb;
}
+static inline struct bdi_writeback *inode_to_wb_wbc(
+ struct inode *inode,
+ struct writeback_control *wbc)
+{
+ return inode_to_wb(inode);
+}
+
+
static inline struct bdi_writeback *
unlocked_inode_to_wb_begin(struct inode *inode, struct wb_lock_cookie *cookie)
{
--- a/include/linux/writeback.h~writeback-reliably-update-bandwidth-estimation
+++ a/include/linux/writeback.h
@@ -379,7 +379,6 @@ int dirty_writeback_centisecs_handler(st
void global_dirty_limits(unsigned long *pbackground, unsigned long *pdirty);
unsigned long wb_calc_thresh(struct bdi_writeback *wb, unsigned long thresh);
-void wb_update_bandwidth(struct bdi_writeback *wb, unsigned long start_time);
void balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited(struct address_space *mapping);
bool wb_over_bg_thresh(struct bdi_writeback *wb);
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c~writeback-reliably-update-bandwidth-estimation
+++ a/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -1332,7 +1332,6 @@ static void wb_update_dirty_ratelimit(st
static void __wb_update_bandwidth(struct dirty_throttle_control *gdtc,
struct dirty_throttle_control *mdtc,
- unsigned long start_time,
bool update_ratelimit)
{
struct bdi_writeback *wb = gdtc->wb;
@@ -1352,13 +1351,6 @@ static void __wb_update_bandwidth(struct
dirtied = percpu_counter_read(&wb->stat[WB_DIRTIED]);
written = percpu_counter_read(&wb->stat[WB_WRITTEN]);
- /*
- * Skip quiet periods when disk bandwidth is under-utilized.
- * (at least 1s idle time between two flusher runs)
- */
- if (elapsed > HZ && time_before(wb->bw_time_stamp, start_time))
- goto snapshot;
-
if (update_ratelimit) {
domain_update_bandwidth(gdtc, now);
wb_update_dirty_ratelimit(gdtc, dirtied, elapsed);
@@ -1374,17 +1366,36 @@ static void __wb_update_bandwidth(struct
}
wb_update_write_bandwidth(wb, elapsed, written);
-snapshot:
wb->dirtied_stamp = dirtied;
wb->written_stamp = written;
wb->bw_time_stamp = now;
}
-void wb_update_bandwidth(struct bdi_writeback *wb, unsigned long start_time)
+static void wb_update_bandwidth(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
{
struct dirty_throttle_control gdtc = { GDTC_INIT(wb) };
- __wb_update_bandwidth(&gdtc, NULL, start_time, false);
+ spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
+ __wb_update_bandwidth(&gdtc, NULL, false);
+ spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
+}
+
+/* Interval after which we consider wb idle and don't estimate bandwidth */
+#define WB_BANDWIDTH_IDLE_JIF (HZ)
+
+static void wb_bandwidth_estimate_start(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
+{
+ unsigned long now = jiffies;
+ unsigned long elapsed = now - READ_ONCE(wb->bw_time_stamp);
+
+ if (elapsed > WB_BANDWIDTH_IDLE_JIF &&
+ !atomic_read(&wb->writeback_inodes)) {
+ spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
+ wb->dirtied_stamp = wb_stat(wb, WB_DIRTIED);
+ wb->written_stamp = wb_stat(wb, WB_WRITTEN);
+ wb->bw_time_stamp = now;
+ spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
+ }
}
/*
@@ -1713,7 +1724,7 @@ free_running:
if (time_is_before_jiffies(wb->bw_time_stamp +
BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL)) {
spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
- __wb_update_bandwidth(gdtc, mdtc, start_time, true);
+ __wb_update_bandwidth(gdtc, mdtc, true);
spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
}
@@ -2347,9 +2358,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_writepages);
int do_writepages(struct address_space *mapping, struct writeback_control *wbc)
{
int ret;
+ struct bdi_writeback *wb;
if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0)
return 0;
+ wb = inode_to_wb_wbc(mapping->host, wbc);
+ wb_bandwidth_estimate_start(wb);
while (1) {
if (mapping->a_ops->writepages)
ret = mapping->a_ops->writepages(mapping, wbc);
@@ -2360,6 +2374,7 @@ int do_writepages(struct address_space *
cond_resched();
congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/50);
}
+ wb_update_bandwidth(wb);
return ret;
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from jack@xxxxxxx are
