Re: [patch 119/212] lazy tlb: shoot lazies, a non-refcounting lazy tlb option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Excerpts from Andrew Morton's message of September 3, 2021 8:53 am:
> On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 15:50:03 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 3:29 PM Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > This pile is:
>> >
>> > Nacked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> Can you specify exactly the range you want me to drop?
>> 
>> I assume it's the four patches 117-120, ie
>> 
>>   lazy tlb: introduce lazy mm refcount helper functions
>>   lazy tlb: allow lazy tlb mm refcounting to be configurable
>>   lazy tlb: shoot lazies, a non-refcounting lazy tlb option
>>   powerpc/64s: enable MMU_LAZY_TLB_SHOOTDOWN
>> 
>> but I just want to double-check before I do surgery on that series.
> 
> Yes, those 4.
> 
> Sorry, I missed that email thread...
> 

That's not reasonable. Andy has had complete misunderstandings about the
series which seems to stem from x86's horrible hacks that have gone in
has confused him.

My series doesn't affect x86 at all and it's no reason why Andy's series
to improve x86 can't be merged later. But that half finished series he 
keeps threatening with has been sitting there for almost a year now and 
it's gone nowhere, while there have been no unresolved technical 
objections to mine, it works, it's simple and small.

I've kept trying to offer to help Andy with reviewing his stuff or fix 
the horrible x86 hacks, but nothing.

So

Un-Nacked-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>


Thanks,
Nick




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux