From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: mm/mempolicy: use readable NUMA_NO_NODE macro instead of magic number The caller of mpol_misplaced() already use NUMA_NO_NODE to check whether current page node is misplaced, thus using NUMA_NO_NODE in mpol_misplaced() instead of magic number is more readable. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1b77c0ce21183fa86f4db250b115cf5e27396528.1627558356.git.baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- mm/mempolicy.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/mm/mempolicy.c~mm-mempolicy-use-readable-numa_no_node-macro-instead-of-magic-numer +++ a/mm/mempolicy.c @@ -2425,8 +2425,8 @@ static void sp_free(struct sp_node *n) * node id. Policy determination "mimics" alloc_page_vma(). * Called from fault path where we know the vma and faulting address. * - * Return: -1 if the page is in a node that is valid for this policy, or a - * suitable node ID to allocate a replacement page from. + * Return: NUMA_NO_NODE if the page is in a node that is valid for this + * policy, or a suitable node ID to allocate a replacement page from. */ int mpol_misplaced(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr) { @@ -2437,7 +2437,7 @@ int mpol_misplaced(struct page *page, st int thiscpu = raw_smp_processor_id(); int thisnid = cpu_to_node(thiscpu); int polnid = NUMA_NO_NODE; - int ret = -1; + int ret = NUMA_NO_NODE; pol = get_vma_policy(vma, addr); if (!(pol->flags & MPOL_F_MOF)) _
