The patch titled
Subject: mm/mempolicy: unify the create() func for bind/interleave/prefer-many policies
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
mm-mempolicy-unify-the-create-func-for-bind-interleave-prefer-many-policies.patch
This patch should soon appear at
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-mempolicy-unify-the-create-func-for-bind-interleave-prefer-many-policies.patch
and later at
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-mempolicy-unify-the-create-func-for-bind-interleave-prefer-many-policies.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/mempolicy: unify the create() func for bind/interleave/prefer-many policies
As they all do the same thing: sanity check and save nodemask info, create
one mpol_new_nodemask() to reduce redundancy.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1627970362-61305-6-git-send-email-feng.tang@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/mempolicy.c | 24 ++++--------------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c~mm-mempolicy-unify-the-create-func-for-bind-interleave-prefer-many-policies
+++ a/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static void mpol_relative_nodemask(nodem
nodes_onto(*ret, tmp, *rel);
}
-static int mpol_new_interleave(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *nodes)
+static int mpol_new_nodemask(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *nodes)
{
if (nodes_empty(*nodes))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -210,22 +210,6 @@ static int mpol_new_preferred(struct mem
return 0;
}
-static int mpol_new_preferred_many(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *nodes)
-{
- if (nodes_empty(*nodes))
- return -EINVAL;
- pol->nodes = *nodes;
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int mpol_new_bind(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *nodes)
-{
- if (nodes_empty(*nodes))
- return -EINVAL;
- pol->nodes = *nodes;
- return 0;
-}
-
/*
* mpol_set_nodemask is called after mpol_new() to set up the nodemask, if
* any, for the new policy. mpol_new() has already validated the nodes
@@ -405,7 +389,7 @@ static const struct mempolicy_operations
.rebind = mpol_rebind_default,
},
[MPOL_INTERLEAVE] = {
- .create = mpol_new_interleave,
+ .create = mpol_new_nodemask,
.rebind = mpol_rebind_nodemask,
},
[MPOL_PREFERRED] = {
@@ -413,14 +397,14 @@ static const struct mempolicy_operations
.rebind = mpol_rebind_preferred,
},
[MPOL_BIND] = {
- .create = mpol_new_bind,
+ .create = mpol_new_nodemask,
.rebind = mpol_rebind_nodemask,
},
[MPOL_LOCAL] = {
.rebind = mpol_rebind_default,
},
[MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY] = {
- .create = mpol_new_preferred_many,
+ .create = mpol_new_nodemask,
.rebind = mpol_rebind_preferred,
},
};
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from feng.tang@xxxxxxxxx are
mm-memplicy-add-page-allocation-function-for-mpol_preferred_many-policy.patch
mm-mempolicy-unify-the-create-func-for-bind-interleave-prefer-many-policies.patch
