+ add-mmap_assert_locked-annotations-to-find_vma.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: mm/pagemap: add mmap_assert_locked() annotations to find_vma*()
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     add-mmap_assert_locked-annotations-to-find_vma.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/add-mmap_assert_locked-annotations-to-find_vma.patch
and later at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/add-mmap_assert_locked-annotations-to-find_vma.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Luigi Rizzo <lrizzo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/pagemap: add mmap_assert_locked() annotations to find_vma*()

find_vma() and variants need protection when used.  This patch adds
mmap_assert_lock() calls in the functions.

To make sure the invariant is satisfied, we also need to add a
mmap_read_loc() around the get_user_pages_remote() call in get_arg_page().
The lock is not strictly necessary because the mm has been newly created,
but the extra cost is limited because the same mutex was also acquired
shortly before in __bprm_mm_init(), so it is hot and uncontended.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210731175341.3458608-1-lrizzo@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Luigi Rizzo <lrizzo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 fs/exec.c |    2 ++
 mm/mmap.c |    2 ++
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/exec.c~add-mmap_assert_locked-annotations-to-find_vma
+++ a/fs/exec.c
@@ -217,8 +217,10 @@ static struct page *get_arg_page(struct
 	 * We are doing an exec().  'current' is the process
 	 * doing the exec and bprm->mm is the new process's mm.
 	 */
+	mmap_read_lock(bprm->mm);
 	ret = get_user_pages_remote(bprm->mm, pos, 1, gup_flags,
 			&page, NULL, NULL);
+	mmap_read_unlock(bprm->mm);
 	if (ret <= 0)
 		return NULL;
 
--- a/mm/mmap.c~add-mmap_assert_locked-annotations-to-find_vma
+++ a/mm/mmap.c
@@ -534,6 +534,7 @@ static int find_vma_links(struct mm_stru
 {
 	struct rb_node **__rb_link, *__rb_parent, *rb_prev;
 
+	mmap_assert_locked(mm);
 	__rb_link = &mm->mm_rb.rb_node;
 	rb_prev = __rb_parent = NULL;
 
@@ -2303,6 +2304,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct *find_vma(struct m
 	struct rb_node *rb_node;
 	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
 
+	mmap_assert_locked(mm);
 	/* Check the cache first. */
 	vma = vmacache_find(mm, addr);
 	if (likely(vma))
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from lrizzo@xxxxxxxxxx are

add-mmap_assert_locked-annotations-to-find_vma.patch




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux