Hi Nathan, On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 3:18 PM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 02:53:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: slub: fix unreclaimable slab stat for bulk free > > > > SLUB uses page allocator for higher order allocations and update > > unreclaimable slab stat for such allocations. At the moment, the bulk > > free for SLUB does not share code with normal free code path for these > > type of allocations and have missed the stat update. So, fix the stat > > update by common code. The user visible impact of the bug is the > > potential of inconsistent unreclaimable slab stat visible through meminfo > > and vmstat. > > > > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210728155354.3440560-1-shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx > > Fixes: 6a486c0ad4dc ("mm, sl[ou]b: improve memory accounting") > > Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > mm/slub.c | 22 ++++++++++++---------- > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > --- a/mm/slub.c~slub-fix-unreclaimable-slab-stat-for-bulk-free > > +++ a/mm/slub.c > > @@ -3236,6 +3236,16 @@ struct detached_freelist { > > struct kmem_cache *s; > > }; > > > > +static inline void free_nonslab_page(struct page *page) > > +{ > > + unsigned int order = compound_order(page); > > + > > + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageCompound(page), page); > > + kfree_hook(page_address(page)); > > + mod_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B, -(PAGE_SIZE << order)); > > + __free_pages(page, order); > > +} > > + > > /* > > * This function progressively scans the array with free objects (with > > * a limited look ahead) and extract objects belonging to the same > > @@ -3272,9 +3282,7 @@ int build_detached_freelist(struct kmem_ > > if (!s) { > > /* Handle kalloc'ed objects */ > > if (unlikely(!PageSlab(page))) { > > - BUG_ON(!PageCompound(page)); > > - kfree_hook(object); > > - __free_pages(page, compound_order(page)); > > + free_nonslab_page(page); > > p[size] = NULL; /* mark object processed */ > > return size; > > } > > @@ -4250,13 +4258,7 @@ void kfree(const void *x) > > > > page = virt_to_head_page(x); > > if (unlikely(!PageSlab(page))) { > > - unsigned int order = compound_order(page); > > - > > - BUG_ON(!PageCompound(page)); > > - kfree_hook(object); > > - mod_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B, > > - -(PAGE_SIZE << order)); > > - __free_pages(page, order); > > + free_nonslab_page(page); > > return; > > } > > slab_free(page->slab_cache, page, object, NULL, 1, _RET_IP_); > > _ > > This patch, now in mainline as commit f227f0faf63b ("slub: fix > unreclaimable slab stat for bulk free") causes the KASAN KUnit test > kmalloc_pagealloc_invalid_free to no longer fail: > > [ 0.000000] Linux version 5.14.0-rc3-00066-gf227f0faf63b (nathan@archlinux-ax161) (x86_64-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.37) #1 SMP Sat Jul 31 15:08:11 MST 2021 > ... > [ 5.717678] # kmalloc_pagealloc_invalid_free: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_kasan.c:203 > [ 5.717678] KASAN failure expected in "kfree(ptr + 1)", but none occurred > [ 5.718909] not ok 6 - kmalloc_pagealloc_invalid_free > ... > [ 9.481520] not ok 1 - kasan > > The previous commit is fine: > > [ 0.000000] Linux version 5.14.0-rc3-00065-gb5916c025432 (nathan@archlinux-ax161) (x86_64-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.37) #1 SMP Sat Jul 31 15:05:09 MST 2021 > ... > [ 9.347598] ok 1 - kasan > > I am by no means a KASAN or mm/ expert, I noticed this when trying to > test KASAN with clang for ClangBuiltLinux's CI, so it does not appear to > be compiler dependent. It is reproducible for me in QEMU with > x86_64_defconfig + CONFIG_KASAN=y + CONFIG_KUNIT=y + > CONFIG_KASAN_KUNIT_TEST=y. > > Please let me know if there is any other information I can provide or > testing I can do. > Thanks for the report. This is actually due to changing kfree_hook(object) to kfree_hook(page_address(page)). The test forces slub to go to the page allocator and then freeing with the next byte address instead of the returned address. Since both are addresses on the same page, the code is fine but the kasan test is not happy. The test is making sure that programmers use the address returned by kmalloc in the kfree. I don't think this is urgent but I will send the patch to fix this during the week. thanks, Shakeel
