+ mm-mremap-fix-memory-account-on-do_munmap-failure.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: mm/mremap: fix memory account on do_munmap() failure
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     mm-mremap-fix-memory-account-on-do_munmap-failure.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-mremap-fix-memory-account-on-do_munmap-failure.patch
and later at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-mremap-fix-memory-account-on-do_munmap-failure.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Chen Wandun <chenwandun@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/mremap: fix memory account on do_munmap() failure

mremap will account the delta between new_len and old_len in
vma_to_resize, and then call move_vma when expanding an existing memory
mapping.  In function move_vma, there are two scenarios when calling
do_munmap:

1. move_page_tables from old_addr to new_addr success
2. move_page_tables from old_addr to new_addr fail

In first scenario, it should account old_len if do_munmap fail, because
the delta has already been accounted.

In second scenario, new_addr/new_len will assign to old_addr/old_len if
move_page_table fail, so do_munmap is try to unmap new_addr actually, if
do_munmap fail, it should account the new_len, because error code will be
return from move_vma, and delta will be unaccounted.  What'more, because
of new_len == old_len, so account old_len also is OK.

In summary, account old_len will be correct if do_munmap fail.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210717101942.120607-1-chenwandun@xxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 51df7bcb6151 ("mm/mremap: account memory on do_munmap() failure")
Signed-off-by: Chen Wandun <chenwandun@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/mremap.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/mm/mremap.c~mm-mremap-fix-memory-account-on-do_munmap-failure
+++ a/mm/mremap.c
@@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ static unsigned long move_vma(struct vm_
 	if (do_munmap(mm, old_addr, old_len, uf_unmap) < 0) {
 		/* OOM: unable to split vma, just get accounts right */
 		if (vm_flags & VM_ACCOUNT && !(flags & MREMAP_DONTUNMAP))
-			vm_acct_memory(new_len >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+			vm_acct_memory(old_len >> PAGE_SHIFT);
 		excess = 0;
 	}
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from chenwandun@xxxxxxxxxx are

mm-mremap-fix-memory-account-on-do_munmap-failure.patch
mm-vmalloc-fix-wrong-behavior-in-vread.patch




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux