The patch titled
Subject: mm/memcontrol.c: fix kerneldoc comment for mem_cgroup_calculate_protection
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-memcontrolc-fix-kerneldoc-comment-for-mem_cgroup_calculate_protection.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/memcontrol.c: fix kerneldoc comment for mem_cgroup_calculate_protection
make W=1 generates the following warning for mem_cgroup_calculate_protection
mm/memcontrol.c:6468: warning: expecting prototype for mem_cgroup_protected(). Prototype was for mem_cgroup_calculate_protection() instead
Commit 45c7f7e1ef17 ("mm, memcg: decouple e{low,min} state mutations from
protection checks") changed the function definition but not the associated
kerneldoc comment.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210520084809.8576-7-mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 45c7f7e1ef17 ("mm, memcg: decouple e{low,min} state mutations from protection checks")
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Chris Down <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~mm-memcontrolc-fix-kerneldoc-comment-for-mem_cgroup_calculate_protection
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -6639,7 +6639,7 @@ static unsigned long effective_protectio
}
/**
- * mem_cgroup_protected - check if memory consumption is in the normal range
+ * mem_cgroup_calculate_protection - check if memory consumption is in the normal range
* @root: the top ancestor of the sub-tree being checked
* @memcg: the memory cgroup to check
*
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
