Re: + mm-mark-idle-page-tracking-as-broken.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 11:54:31AM -0400, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 04:37:17PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 06:29:19PM -0400, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> > > > In discussion with other MM developers around how idle page tracking
> > > > should be fixed for transparent huge pages, several expressed the opinion
> > > > that it should be removed as it is inefficient at accomplishing the job
> > > > that it is supposed to, and we have better mechanisms (eg uffd) for
> > > > accomplishing the same goals these days.
> > > 
> > > I didn't follow the aforementioned discussion, so it would be nice to
> > > have a little bit more detailed explanation on both points raised here
> > > (issues with THP and innefficiency). There are some Red Hat customers
> > > and partners that do rely on the feature, thus the interest. Thanks.
> > 
> > It would be nice if you asked this on the original thread (which you're
> > cc'd on) instead of starting a new thread.
> 
> Sorry about that, but for some weird reason only Andrew's email made its way
> into my inbox.

You should probably file a bug with your IT department then.  There are
a dozen emails cc'ing you in this thread, some from people in your own
company:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210612000714.775825-1-willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux