The patch titled
Subject: include/trace/events/vmscan.h: remove mm_vmscan_inactive_list_is_low
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
include-trace-events-vmscanh-remove-mm_vmscan_inactive_list_is_low.patch
This patch should soon appear at
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/include-trace-events-vmscanh-remove-mm_vmscan_inactive_list_is_low.patch
and later at
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/include-trace-events-vmscanh-remove-mm_vmscan_inactive_list_is_low.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: include/trace/events/vmscan.h: remove mm_vmscan_inactive_list_is_low
mm_vmscan_inactive_list_is_low has no users after commit b91ac374346b
("mm: vmscan: enforce inactive:active ratio at the reclaim root").
Remove it.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210614194554.2683395-1-yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/trace/events/vmscan.h | 41 --------------------------------
1 file changed, 41 deletions(-)
--- a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h~include-trace-events-vmscanh-remove-mm_vmscan_inactive_list_is_low
+++ a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
@@ -423,47 +423,6 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active,
show_reclaim_flags(__entry->reclaim_flags))
);
-TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_inactive_list_is_low,
-
- TP_PROTO(int nid, int reclaim_idx,
- unsigned long total_inactive, unsigned long inactive,
- unsigned long total_active, unsigned long active,
- unsigned long ratio, int file),
-
- TP_ARGS(nid, reclaim_idx, total_inactive, inactive, total_active, active, ratio, file),
-
- TP_STRUCT__entry(
- __field(int, nid)
- __field(int, reclaim_idx)
- __field(unsigned long, total_inactive)
- __field(unsigned long, inactive)
- __field(unsigned long, total_active)
- __field(unsigned long, active)
- __field(unsigned long, ratio)
- __field(int, reclaim_flags)
- ),
-
- TP_fast_assign(
- __entry->nid = nid;
- __entry->reclaim_idx = reclaim_idx;
- __entry->total_inactive = total_inactive;
- __entry->inactive = inactive;
- __entry->total_active = total_active;
- __entry->active = active;
- __entry->ratio = ratio;
- __entry->reclaim_flags = trace_reclaim_flags(file) &
- RECLAIM_WB_LRU;
- ),
-
- TP_printk("nid=%d reclaim_idx=%d total_inactive=%ld inactive=%ld total_active=%ld active=%ld ratio=%ld flags=%s",
- __entry->nid,
- __entry->reclaim_idx,
- __entry->total_inactive, __entry->inactive,
- __entry->total_active, __entry->active,
- __entry->ratio,
- show_reclaim_flags(__entry->reclaim_flags))
-);
-
TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_node_reclaim_begin,
TP_PROTO(int nid, int order, gfp_t gfp_flags),
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx are
mm-vmscanc-fix-potential-deadlock-in-reclaim_pages.patch
include-trace-events-vmscanh-remove-mm_vmscan_inactive_list_is_low.patch
