[to-be-updated] mm-memoryc-allow-different-return-codes-for-copy_nonpresent_pte.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: mm/memory.c: allow different return codes for copy_nonpresent_pte()
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-memoryc-allow-different-return-codes-for-copy_nonpresent_pte.patch

This patch was dropped because an updated version will be merged

------------------------------------------------------
From: Alistair Popple <apopple@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/memory.c: allow different return codes for copy_nonpresent_pte()

Currently if copy_nonpresent_pte() returns a non-zero value it is assumed
to be a swap entry which requires further processing outside the loop in
copy_pte_range() after dropping locks.  This prevents other values being
returned to signal conditions such as failure which a subsequent change
requires.

Instead make copy_nonpresent_pte() return an error code if further
processing is required and read the value for the swap entry in the main
loop under the ptl.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210524132725.12697-7-apopple@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/memory.c |   12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/memory.c~mm-memoryc-allow-different-return-codes-for-copy_nonpresent_pte
+++ a/mm/memory.c
@@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ copy_nonpresent_pte(struct mm_struct *ds
 
 	if (likely(!non_swap_entry(entry))) {
 		if (swap_duplicate(entry) < 0)
-			return entry.val;
+			return -EAGAIN;
 
 		/* make sure dst_mm is on swapoff's mmlist. */
 		if (unlikely(list_empty(&dst_mm->mmlist))) {
@@ -974,11 +974,13 @@ again:
 			continue;
 		}
 		if (unlikely(!pte_present(*src_pte))) {
-			entry.val = copy_nonpresent_pte(dst_mm, src_mm,
-							dst_pte, src_pte,
-							src_vma, addr, rss);
-			if (entry.val)
+			ret = copy_nonpresent_pte(dst_mm, src_mm,
+						dst_pte, src_pte,
+						src_vma, addr, rss);
+			if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
+				entry = pte_to_swp_entry(*src_pte);
 				break;
+			}
 			progress += 8;
 			continue;
 		}
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from apopple@xxxxxxxxxx are

mm-device-exclusive-memory-access.patch
mm-selftests-for-exclusive-device-memory.patch
nouveau-svm-refactor-nouveau_range_fault.patch
nouveau-svm-implement-atomic-svm-access.patch




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux