The patch titled
Subject: kasan: test: improve failure message in KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL()
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
kasan-test-improve-failure-message-in-kunit_expect_kasan_fail.patch
This patch should soon appear at
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/kasan-test-improve-failure-message-in-kunit_expect_kasan_fail.patch
and later at
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/kasan-test-improve-failure-message-in-kunit_expect_kasan_fail.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: kasan: test: improve failure message in KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL()
The KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL() macro currently uses KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ() to
compare fail_data.report_expected and fail_data.report_found. This always
gave a somewhat useless error message on failure, but the addition of
extra compile-time checking with READ_ONCE() has caused it to get much
longer, and be truncated before anything useful is displayed.
Instead, just check fail_data.report_found by hand (we've just set
report_expected to 'true'), and print a better failure message with
KUNIT_FAIL(). Because of this, report_expected is no longer used
anywhere, and can be removed.
Beforehand, a failure in:
KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, ((volatile char *)area)[3100]);
would have looked like:
[22:00:34] [FAILED] vmalloc_oob
[22:00:34] # vmalloc_oob: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_kasan.c:991
[22:00:34] Expected ({ do { extern void __compiletime_assert_705(void) __attribute__((__error__("Unsupported access size for {READ,WRITE}_ONCE()."))); if (!((sizeof(fail_data.report_expected) == sizeof(char) || sizeof(fail_data.repp
[22:00:34] not ok 45 - vmalloc_oob
With this change, it instead looks like:
[22:04:04] [FAILED] vmalloc_oob
[22:04:04] # vmalloc_oob: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_kasan.c:993
[22:04:04] KASAN failure expected in "((volatile char *)area)[3100]", but none occurred
[22:04:04] not ok 45 - vmalloc_oob
Also update the example failure in the documentation to reflect this.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210606005531.165954-1-davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Daniel Axtens <dja@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst | 9 ++++-----
include/linux/kasan.h | 1 -
lib/test_kasan.c | 11 +++++------
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst~kasan-test-improve-failure-message-in-kunit_expect_kasan_fail
+++ a/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst
@@ -447,11 +447,10 @@ When a test fails due to a failed ``kmal
When a test fails due to a missing KASAN report::
- # kmalloc_double_kzfree: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_kasan.c:629
- Expected kasan_data->report_expected == kasan_data->report_found, but
- kasan_data->report_expected == 1
- kasan_data->report_found == 0
- not ok 28 - kmalloc_double_kzfree
+ # kmalloc_double_kzfree: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_kasan.c:974
+ KASAN failure expected in "kfree_sensitive(ptr)", but none occurred
+ not ok 44 - kmalloc_double_kzfree
+
At the end the cumulative status of all KASAN tests is printed. On success::
--- a/include/linux/kasan.h~kasan-test-improve-failure-message-in-kunit_expect_kasan_fail
+++ a/include/linux/kasan.h
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ struct task_struct;
/* kasan_data struct is used in KUnit tests for KASAN expected failures */
struct kunit_kasan_expectation {
- bool report_expected;
bool report_found;
};
--- a/lib/test_kasan.c~kasan-test-improve-failure-message-in-kunit_expect_kasan_fail
+++ a/lib/test_kasan.c
@@ -55,7 +55,6 @@ static int kasan_test_init(struct kunit
multishot = kasan_save_enable_multi_shot();
kasan_set_tagging_report_once(false);
fail_data.report_found = false;
- fail_data.report_expected = false;
kunit_add_named_resource(test, NULL, NULL, &resource,
"kasan_data", &fail_data);
return 0;
@@ -94,20 +93,20 @@ static void kasan_test_exit(struct kunit
!kasan_async_mode_enabled()) \
migrate_disable(); \
KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, READ_ONCE(fail_data.report_found)); \
- WRITE_ONCE(fail_data.report_expected, true); \
barrier(); \
expression; \
barrier(); \
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, \
- READ_ONCE(fail_data.report_expected), \
- READ_ONCE(fail_data.report_found)); \
+ if (!READ_ONCE(fail_data.report_found)) { \
+ KUNIT_FAIL(test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "KASAN failure " \
+ "expected in \"" #expression \
+ "\", but none occurred"); \
+ } \
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS)) { \
if (READ_ONCE(fail_data.report_found)) \
kasan_enable_tagging_sync(); \
migrate_enable(); \
} \
WRITE_ONCE(fail_data.report_found, false); \
- WRITE_ONCE(fail_data.report_expected, false); \
} while (0)
#define KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_ON(test, config) do { \
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx are
kasan-test-improve-failure-message-in-kunit_expect_kasan_fail.patch
