From: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: ipc/sem.c: mundane typo fixes s/runtine/runtime/ s/AQUIRE/ACQUIRE/ s/seperately/separately/ s/wont/won\'t/ s/succesfull/successful/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210326022240.26375-1-unixbhaskar@xxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@xxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- ipc/sem.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- a/ipc/sem.c~ipc-semc-mundane-typo-fixes +++ a/ipc/sem.c @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ * - two Linux specific semctl() commands: SEM_STAT, SEM_INFO. * - undo adjustments at process exit are limited to 0..SEMVMX. * - namespace are supported. - * - SEMMSL, SEMMNS, SEMOPM and SEMMNI can be configured at runtine by writing + * - SEMMSL, SEMMNS, SEMOPM and SEMMNI can be configured at runtime by writing * to /proc/sys/kernel/sem. * - statistics about the usage are reported in /proc/sysvipc/sem. * @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static int sysvipc_sem_proc_show(struct * Setting it to a result code is a RELEASE, this is ensured by both a * smp_store_release() (for case a) and while holding sem_lock() * (for case b). - * The AQUIRE when reading the result code without holding sem_lock() is + * The ACQUIRE when reading the result code without holding sem_lock() is * achieved by using READ_ONCE() + smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep(). * (case a above). * Reading the result code while holding sem_lock() needs no further barriers, @@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ static inline int check_restart(struct s /* It is impossible that someone waits for the new value: * - complex operations always restart. - * - wait-for-zero are handled seperately. + * - wait-for-zero are handled separately. * - q is a previously sleeping simple operation that * altered the array. It must be a decrement, because * simple increments never sleep. @@ -1046,7 +1046,7 @@ static void do_smart_update(struct sem_a * - No complex ops, thus all sleeping ops are * decrease. * - if we decreased the value, then any sleeping - * semaphore ops wont be able to run: If the + * semaphore ops won't be able to run: If the * previous value was too small, then the new * value will be too small, too. */ @@ -2108,7 +2108,7 @@ static long do_semtimedop(int semid, str queue.dupsop = dupsop; error = perform_atomic_semop(sma, &queue); - if (error == 0) { /* non-blocking succesfull path */ + if (error == 0) { /* non-blocking successful path */ DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q); /* _
