The patch titled
Subject: slub: remove resiliency_test() function
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
slub-remove-resiliency_test-function.patch
This patch should soon appear at
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/slub-remove-resiliency_test-function.patch
and later at
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/slub-remove-resiliency_test-function.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Oliver Glitta <glittao@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: slub: remove resiliency_test() function
Function resiliency_test() is hidden behind #ifdef SLUB_RESILIENCY_TEST
that is not part of Kconfig, so nobody runs it.
This function is replaced with KUnit test for SLUB added by the previous
patch "selftests: add a KUnit test for SLUB debugging functionality".
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210331085156.5028-2-glittao@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Oliver Glitta <glittao@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/slub.c | 64 ----------------------------------------------------
1 file changed, 64 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/slub.c~slub-remove-resiliency_test-function
+++ a/mm/slub.c
@@ -153,9 +153,6 @@ static inline bool kmem_cache_has_cpu_pa
* - Variable sizing of the per node arrays
*/
-/* Enable to test recovery from slab corruption on boot */
-#undef SLUB_RESILIENCY_TEST
-
/* Enable to log cmpxchg failures */
#undef SLUB_DEBUG_CMPXCHG
@@ -4932,66 +4929,6 @@ static int list_locations(struct kmem_ca
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG */
-#ifdef SLUB_RESILIENCY_TEST
-static void __init resiliency_test(void)
-{
- u8 *p;
- int type = KMALLOC_NORMAL;
-
- BUILD_BUG_ON(KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE > 16 || KMALLOC_SHIFT_HIGH < 10);
-
- pr_err("SLUB resiliency testing\n");
- pr_err("-----------------------\n");
- pr_err("A. Corruption after allocation\n");
-
- p = kzalloc(16, GFP_KERNEL);
- p[16] = 0x12;
- pr_err("\n1. kmalloc-16: Clobber Redzone/next pointer 0x12->0x%p\n\n",
- p + 16);
-
- validate_slab_cache(kmalloc_caches[type][4]);
-
- /* Hmmm... The next two are dangerous */
- p = kzalloc(32, GFP_KERNEL);
- p[32 + sizeof(void *)] = 0x34;
- pr_err("\n2. kmalloc-32: Clobber next pointer/next slab 0x34 -> -0x%p\n",
- p);
- pr_err("If allocated object is overwritten then not detectable\n\n");
-
- validate_slab_cache(kmalloc_caches[type][5]);
- p = kzalloc(64, GFP_KERNEL);
- p += 64 + (get_cycles() & 0xff) * sizeof(void *);
- *p = 0x56;
- pr_err("\n3. kmalloc-64: corrupting random byte 0x56->0x%p\n",
- p);
- pr_err("If allocated object is overwritten then not detectable\n\n");
- validate_slab_cache(kmalloc_caches[type][6]);
-
- pr_err("\nB. Corruption after free\n");
- p = kzalloc(128, GFP_KERNEL);
- kfree(p);
- *p = 0x78;
- pr_err("1. kmalloc-128: Clobber first word 0x78->0x%p\n\n", p);
- validate_slab_cache(kmalloc_caches[type][7]);
-
- p = kzalloc(256, GFP_KERNEL);
- kfree(p);
- p[50] = 0x9a;
- pr_err("\n2. kmalloc-256: Clobber 50th byte 0x9a->0x%p\n\n", p);
- validate_slab_cache(kmalloc_caches[type][8]);
-
- p = kzalloc(512, GFP_KERNEL);
- kfree(p);
- p[512] = 0xab;
- pr_err("\n3. kmalloc-512: Clobber redzone 0xab->0x%p\n\n", p);
- validate_slab_cache(kmalloc_caches[type][9]);
-}
-#else
-#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
-static void resiliency_test(void) {};
-#endif
-#endif /* SLUB_RESILIENCY_TEST */
-
#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
enum slab_stat_type {
SL_ALL, /* All slabs */
@@ -5840,7 +5777,6 @@ static int __init slab_sysfs_init(void)
}
mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex);
- resiliency_test();
return 0;
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from glittao@xxxxxxxxx are
kunit-add-a-kunit-test-for-slub-debugging-functionality.patch
slub-remove-resiliency_test-function.patch
